Archive for the ‘ Hawaii politics ’ Category

A heated local debate has brewed for several years in our City and County of Honolulu most loudly in our Windward neighborhoods.

The issue; Bed & Breakfasts.  Small lodging establishments that offer overnight accommodation and breakfast, but usually do not offer other meals. Typically, bed and breakfasts are private homes with fewer than 10 bedrooms available for commercial use.

Concerns of property value, public safety, property rights and business revenue have fueled both sides of the fence.

Larry Bartley, a Windward neighborhood board member, will represent opposition to B & Bs.  Jim Henshaw, former state senatorial candidate, will represent the side in favor of B & Bs.

Professor Ken Schoolland will moderate with question and answers to follow.  $5 per guest for drinks and pupus.

Date:
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Time:
6:00pm - 8:00pm
Location:
Schoolland’s home
Street:
94-1072 Alelo St.
City/Town:
Waipahu, HI
Phone:
8086760825
Email:

John Carroll

John Carroll

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Media Contacts:

Barbara Hester – PR Coordinator  (808) 384-5907

Gayle Gardner – Campaign Chairman (808) 595-7127

Alice Paet-Ah Sing - Campaign Director (808) 542-2902

John Carroll – Candidate (808) 526-9111 (808) 545-3800 fax

Gubernatorial Candidate, John Carroll, Former State Senator and Former Chair of the Republican Party of Hawai‘i, announced today that he and Honolulu attorney Christopher Dias have filed a precedent setting law suit.  The suit requests for injunctive relief from the United States Government, relief from the provisions of the Jones Act, which created shipping restrictions that adversely apply to only one State in the Union; the island State of Hawai`i.  Carroll stated that the restrictions are excessively expensive for Hawai`i’s people and are in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as well as the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Carroll stated that he had originally intended to instruct his Attorney General to file a class action on behalf of the people of the State of Hawai`i when he took office as Governor.  He now states he sees no reason to delay.  Carroll believes in getting things done.  Carroll explained,  “One of the purposes of enacting the Jones Act was to ensure that the United States of America would be well equipped with a maritime fleet that could compete in a worldwide economy.  Unfortunately, it created unconstitutional restrictions on commerce between the State of Hawai`i and worldwide shippers as well as on interstate commerce.”

Since Hawai`i is separated from the continental United States by 2,300 miles of ocean and, of course, has no highways, railroads or pipelines from the continental United States, Hawai`i is dependent on ocean shipping for at least 90 percent of every commodity used and consumed in the state.

The Impact of the Jones Act on the People of Hawai‘i

The Jones Act requires that for a ship to operate in interstate commerce, (between states), it must be built in America, owned by Americans, 75 percent manned by an American crew, and maintained and flagged in the United States.  The net effect of the enforcement of the Jones Act on the State of Hawai‘i’s population has been wide-ranging.

Examples:  The expense of agricultural production became prohibitive, not only because of the inbound shipping cost of fertilizers, herbicides, and farm implements but also due to the outbound shipping costs for our locally grown fruits, livestock and ornamental plants.  Hawai‘i cattle ranchers are faced with an intolerable situation.  They often have to transport their cattle, from Kawaihae to Vancouver B.C. on a Canadian owned Corral Lines to remain profitable.  The cattle must then be trucked (often for 500 miles)  into the U.S. to be fattened and sold.  To go direct, some are flown on Boeing 747 aircraft.

There has emerged a monopolistic control of shipping in and out of the State of Hawai‘i, eliminating the cost reduction benefits of competition.  As will be shown at trial, the cost of everything from automobiles to paper towels is significantly higher because of the enforcement of the Jones Act provisions.

By comparison, the tiny islands of Singapore and Hong Kong, which do not have similar trade restrictions and with less than 1/20th the land mass of Hawai’i, enjoy a Gross Domestic Product in excess of two billion (2,000,000,000.00) U.S. dollars per year. That is 40 times greater than Hawai`i’s GDP of fifty million (50,000,000.00) U.S. dollars per year when government spending and tourism are excluded. This is an absurdity for Hawai‘i’s economic viability.

The Fundamental Purposes of the Commerce Clause

The fundamental purposes of the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution are, among others, “…to assure the unrestricted flow of commerce throughout the several states,” 282 NE2d 336,  “…to assure to the commercial enterprises in every state substantial equality to access to a free national market,” 517 P2d 691.  Further, the “…power granted is a positive power to legislate concerning transactions which, reaching across state boundaries, affect the people of more states than one, and to govern affairs which the individual states,with their limited territorial jurisdictions, are not fully capable of governing.” 322 US 533.  Clearly, the Jones Act and its provisions are in direct violation of the spirit of the Commerce Clause.

H.C.R. 100 Does Not Honor Extreme Terrorists

By Rep. Kym Pine

Republican State Rep. Kymberly Pine says State Senator Sam Slom’s statements on Islam Day are insensitive and wrong.  Rep. Pine said, “Slom equated the Legislature’s passage of H.C.R. 100, entitled “House Resolution Proclaiming September 24, 2009, As Islam Day.” to the honoring of extreme terrorists.  Slom’s statements marginalize significant and peaceful Hawaii citizens.  Our Hawaii and U.S. Constitutions recognize liberties and rights not favoring one personal faith over another.  Recognition through a House Resolution of one faith group’s contribution to our multi-faith Hawaii has been common practice.  Groups have been recognized through House Resolutions including the fourth Saturday of July as an annual Kupuna Recognition Day, April 6 as Tartan (Scottish heritage) Day and Sept. 28, 2007 as Confucius Day in Hawaii.  As leaders we must be very clear that not all Muslims are terrorists.  Terrorists have very different backgrounds and beliefs than Hawaii Muslims.”

What is a political party? Are there any differences between political parties?  What purposes do political parties serve?  Is a two party system all we have?  This month’s Li Zhao’s Intellectual Salon, Idea Exchange topic is “Party Schisms”.

Ken Schoolland will moderate this forum with Q&A to follow with Arvid Youngquist a Hawaii Democrat, Dan Douglass a Hawaii Republican and Larry Bartley a Hawaii Libertarian.

Please bring a friend and your favorite drink.

Pupus will be served. $5 donation per person.

Phone:
8086760825
Email:
Date:
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Time:
6:00pm - 8:00pm
Location:
The Schoolland’s
Street:
94-1072 Alelo St.
City/Town:
Waipahu, HI

By Russell Pang

HONOLULU – Governor Linda Lingle today submitted to the State Legislature the Administration’s plan to meet a projected $650 million revenue shortfall for the remainder of the current fiscal year (FY09) and biennium budget fiscal years 2010 through 2011.

The Administration’s plan balances the budget without raising taxes, without any layoffs or furloughs of state employees, and without making significant cuts to essential public services or programs.  It combines the use of federal stimulus funds, tobacco funds, interest from and charges to various special funds, adjustments to selected benefits for state employees, and further tightening Act 221 tax credits.

“While we are working to take maximum advantage of the federal funds available through the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, the additional federal funds alone will not be sufficient to close the projected revenue shortfall,” said Governor Lingle.

“In developing this balanced budget plan, our top priorities were to ensure we do not take any more taxpayer money out of the economy to support government, that we not add to the state’s unemployment by laying off employees, that we preserve essential public services, and that we continue to invest available resources in projects that will create jobs in the near term and achieve our long-term priorities such as energy independence.  This budget accomplishes those goals,” the Governor added.

In December, Governor Lingle submitted her Administration’s FY10-FY11 biennium budget which included a detailed plan to make up for a $1.1 billion revenue shortfall projected by the Council on Revenues.  On January 9, 2009, the Council lowered its revenue projections further by an additional $650 million for FY09, FY10 and FY11.

The Governor subsequently submitted an $81 million plan to close the FY09 shortfall through a combination of transferring funds from various special funds, including the rainy day fund, implementing additional restrictions on discretionary spending and utilizing additional federal reimbursements for Medicaid.

“Over the past year, we have made difficult but necessary decisions to reduce spending to ensure the state lives within its means,” the Governor said.  “At the same time, unprecedented national and global fiscal and economic challenges continue to impact our local economy and these realities mandate that we cannot continue to operate in a business-as-usual manner.

“We also must resist the impulse to raise taxes and fees because Hawai‘i’s families and small businesses are facing unprecedented challenges. We must ensure they keep as much of their money as possible.”

The Governor pointed out that additional budget adjustments will likely be needed when the Council on Revenues meets again on March 12, because it is anticipated that the Council will revise its revenue forecasts downward.

In addition to the plan to close the FY09 shortfall, the Administration is proposing the following nine action items to provide the state with additional general fund revenues needed to close the revenue shortfall:

  • Utilize federal stimulus Medicaid funds. Nearly half of the shortfall will be covered by an estimated $320 million in Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) funds. The matching federal funds for treating Medicaid patients are part of the $15 billion in Medicaid assistance being made available to the states under the recently passed federal stimulus plan. Hawai‘i is scheduled to receive $106.7 million for FY09, $142.2. million in FY10 and $71.1 million in FY11.  As of last week, states were allowed to start accessing FMAP funds (Impact: $320 million, FY09-FY11.)
  • Redistribute a portion of the Tobacco Settlement Funds. The Administration supports a bill (HB1731) currently before the Legislature to reallocate the distribution of the Tobacco Settlement Special Fund, including depositing 14 percent into the state’s general fund.  This action would add $7 million per year to the state’s revenues.  (Impact: $14 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Transfer tobacco tax revenues to the general fund. The Administration supports a bill (HB1732) currently before the Legislature which would allow the use of tobacco tax revenues. The redistribution of the tobacco tax is expected to add $33 million to the state’s general fund in the upcoming biennium. (Impact: $33 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Advance the general excise tax filing date. The Administration supports a bill (HB1735) currently before the Legislature to change the filing date for the general excise monthly tax return from the last day of the calendar month following the month in which taxes accrue to the 20th day of that month.  The earlier collection of taxes within the fiscal year will generate a one-time revenue gain of $40 million in FY11.  (Impact:  $40 million, FY11.)
  • Remove the exemption for certain special funds from assessments. The Administration proposes removing a provision that currently exempts certain special funds from paying their fair share of assessments to support central services and departmental administrative expenses.  A bill (HB1740) currently before the Legislature would remove the exemption for all but a handful of special funds, including the Hawai‘i Hurricane Relief Fund, Convention Center Enterprise Special Fund and Tourism Special Fund.  The Administration supports this measure, but proposes also allowing the following special funds to retain the exemption from assessments:  State Educational Facilities Improvement Special Fund, Hawai‘i Health Systems Corporation Special Fund and University of Hawai‘i Special Fund.  This action would result in an additional $9.8 million annually. (Impact: $19.6 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Transfer interest earned on certain special funds to the general fund. The Administration supports a measure (HB1733) before the Legislature to allow the transfer of interest earned on investments of special funds, revolving funds and special accounts into the general fund.  This action would not impact the amount in these funds that are generated through user fees or charges.  The use of the interest earnings would result in an estimated $38.2 million in general fund revenues. (Impact: $38.2 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Discontinue employer-funded group life insurance. The Administration supports a bill (HB1726) currently before the Legislature to prevent the Hawai‘i Employer-Union Health Benefit Trust Fund (EUTF) from providing group life insurance benefits if the premiums are paid for by the state or a county.  Currently, the employer (the state or a county) pays the entire premium for the life insurance benefit.  Premiums are more expensive than paying death benefits directly to survivors.  Discontinuing this practice would save the state $4.1 million in FY10 and $4.3 million in FY11.  (Impact: $8.4 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Seek adjustments to the EUTF health benefits plan. The Administration will seek adjustments to the current Employer-Union Health Benefit Trust Fund health plan through collective bargaining negotiations. If the current health benefits plan is sustained, with the state covering 60 percent of the cost, the premiums will increase by an estimated 29.4 percent.  This proposal would not affect retirees and their dependent beneficiaries. This effort would provide a cost savings of approximately $48 million per year.  (Impact: $96 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Further tighten Act 221 to reduce tax credits to investors in technology businesses. Rather than allowing investors to get back a full dollar for each dollar they invest, investors will receive 50 cents for each dollar invested, sharing their risk with state taxpayers.  This effort will save an estimated $43.9 in the biennium. (Impact: $43.9 million, FY10-FY11.)

In addition to closing the revenue shortfall over the next two years, the Administration is also focused on ensuring long-term fiscal stability for the state.  The Administration supports a bill (HB1715) currently before the Legislature to increase by five years the minimum retirement age and minimum length of service before a state employee can receive full service retirement benefits.  The measure would only apply to employees who enter public service on or after July 1, 2009.  The annual savings for this proposal starting in FY2013 is approximately $39 million.

The U.S. Supreme Court released the full transcript from this morning’s hearing.

http://www.inversecondemnation.com/files/07-1372.pdf

Two Hawaii State Capitol insider blogs, The Notebook and Poinography have generated the most activity on the subject of the Civil Union (HB444) legislation over the past several days with state and even city officials weighing in both in pseudonym and in name.  Proponents and now opponents near and far have there eyes on this bill.

Testimony in the House last week was dominated by proponents of HB 444.  It is now in Senate Judiciary committee with it’s members receiving a wave of emails and calls after opponents of HB 444 began organizing efforts this past weekend.

Former LIUNA union representative, Jimmy Kuroiwa, estimated around fifty church and faith community leaders attended the meeting called by Hawaii Family Forum within 24 hour notice.  Former state Representative Dennis Arakaki is the current head of Hawaii Family Forum.  A rally at the Capitol has been scheduled by the group for this Sunday, February 22 at 2p.  Thousands are expected to attend.

.

Part I covered the history and purpose of the Jones Act.

Part II covered proponents arguments and analysis.

For the full study with all figures and tables, log on to Jones Act study 2009.

By Daniel Brackins

Job Protectionism and Unemployment

As has been noted the U.S. shipping industry attempts to increases the wages of its employers with the use of the Jones Act. This is primarily accomplished through unions. A binding minimum wage can be introduced either by law or through collective bargaining.

The point of intersection of the supply and demand curves is the equilibrium point where supply equals demand. This point changes with shifts in the demand for labor (increase in demand for labor will increase price of labor).  If labor markets were free to operate with no outside influence, then supply would equal demand, and all those who desired employment would be employed.

We see that if the wage rate is higher than the equilibrium wage rate, the supply of labor will exceed the demand. By creating an artificial price floor for labor that is above the equilibrium wage rate, the supply of labor will exceed the demand (at that wage rate) and not all people who seek employment will be able to find a job. Note that if the wage is set below the equilibrium wage, it will have no effect on the equilibrium point for the labor market (a nonbinding constraint). The higher the minimum wage above the equilibrium wage, the greater is the impact. The magnitude of the impact is also determined by the number of people who are currently being paid the minimum wage, and therefore directly affected by the change. Bargaining power obtained through the representation of large numbers of workers can result in wage rates that are well above the equilibrium rate. Often studies allude to cases where there appears to be little or no negative effects resulting from a minimum wage increase. These conclusions may occur due to the magnitude, timing, and number of employees impacted by the increase.

There is an inability for unions to create wage equality through artificial wage inflation. In the unions’ attempt to equalize wages they have essentially done the opposite. An artificial increase in wages above the real market value assumes an infinite amount of monetary supply (Gallaway & Vetter, n.d.). With this failed logic it would be acceptable to pay a floor sweeper $50 per hour or perhaps $500 per hour. Yet the money supply is not unlimited; therefore, any shift will create a side effect. As a result any money given to one person must be taken from another. In the case of wage inequality it is wages that would have been given to another had the wages been

In the industry represented in the diagram there are a total of 5,000 jobs possible before saturation occurs.The market rate has established $10 per hour for this job and would allow for maximization and full employment. However, if an artificial rate were established at $50 per hour, as a result, only 1,000 workers could be utilized. This would prevent 4,000 workers from entering the industry.

Decline of U.S. Shipping

In comparison to other nations without cabotage restrictions there has been a decline in the U.S. shipping fleet, losing out to the competition of these other nations (Competition, 2006).  This is occurring despite the protectionist policies of the United States.  A comparison of vessels operating can be seen in figures 3 and 4.

It must be noted that the protectionist policies of the U.S. has reduced the number of U.S. flagged ships in operation.  On the other hand countries that exercise free trade policies, without cabotage laws, such as Panama, Singapore, and Hong Kong have a flourishing merchant fleet.  Open competition has created incentives for companies to operate in these nations.  Even U.S. shipping companies are aware of this benefit.  Despite having to pay a 36% penalty fee under Jones Act laws, Matson has some of its ships repaired in Shanghai, China.  Matson spokeman Jeff Hull stated, “[despite the fee] it’s still considerably cheaper” (Little, 2001).

References

1800JonesAct. (2008). The Jones Act U.S.C. Title 46 (Recodified 2006). Retrieved November 21, 2008 from http://www.1800jonesact.com/maritime_statutes/default.asp

Competition in the Noncontiguous Domestic Maritime Trades (2006).  U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration.

Little, R. (2001). U.S. merchant fleets sails toward oblivion.  The Baltimore Sun.  Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.mcall.com/topic/balte.bz.
sealift06aug06,0,7707946.story?page=1

Longshormen, Making $100K Per Year, Won’t Reduce Demands (2002). Rense.com. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://www.rense.com/general30/long.htm

Maritime Flags of Convenience Visualized (2007). gCaptain. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/tag/data/

McClintock, M. (2004). Merchant Marine Act of 1920. eNotes.com. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/merchant-marine-act

Official USDA Alaska and Hawaii Thrifty Food Plans: Cost of Food at Home (2008).  United States Department of Agriculture.

Official USDA Food Plans: Cost of Food at Home at Four Levels (2008).  United States Department of Agriculture.

The Economic Effects of Significant U.S. Import Restrains Fifth Update 2007 Investigation No. 332-325 (2007).  United States International Trade Commission.

The Hidden Costs of U.S. Shipping Laws (1996).  Public Interest Institute.

The Price of Paradise! (n.d.). Alternative-Hawaii. Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.alternative-hawaii.com/overpop.htm

The World Factbook (2008).  Central Intelligence Agency.  Retrieved October 2, 2008 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

The civil unions for same-sex couples battle in our State Capitol just turned up a notch this weekend.  A new website, http://protectourkeiki.com/ has targeted Waipahu/Pearl City/Crestview Senator Clarence Nishihara as “RUINING HAWAII” and “WANTS YOUR KEIKI TO BELIEVE THAT SAME SEX MARRIAGE IS OK.”

As reported in the Honolulu Advertiser, Nishihara supports HB444.

If a firestorm of opposition now erupts because of this bill as this issue erupted in ‘98, how will it effect gubernatorial and lt. gubernatorial hopefuls Hanabusa, Hooser and Bunda in the Senate?  What about House members looking at their options?

It was in ‘98 that then Senator Rey Graulty was defeated by Senator Norman Sakamoto in the Democratic primary.   Graulty was a proponet of same-sex marriage while Sakamoto, a socially conservative Democrat, campaigned strategically on the same-sex marriage issue.  Mailouts went to every voting househould with pictures of two wedding cakes.  One cake with two men on it saying Graulty supports same-sex marriage and the other cake with a man and a woman on it saying Sakamoto supports traditional marriage.

The focus of the traditional marriage proponents message in ‘98 emphasized that same-sex marriage would be taught to children as equal to opposite-sex marriage.  This is similar to messaging now used on the new site targeting Nishihara.  Whoever the mind or minds behind the “Protect Our Keiki” site are, they (and ambitious politicians) should soon see how effective their messaging is 11 years later.

Editor’s note:  Hawaii Liberty Chronicles contributor, Daniel Brackins, has released his research on the Jones Act’s economic impact on Hawaii written on assignment for his 6000 level Economics course at Hawaii Pacific University.  It will be released in parts with this first portion covering the history and purpose of the Jones Act.  Pictures added at editors discretion.

The Merchant Marine Act of 1920, commonly referred to as the Jones Act, is a United States Federal statute that regulates maritime commerce in U.S. waters and between U.S. ports.  It is a cabotage law which also contains provisions regarding seamen’s rights.  These cabotage provisions restrict the carriage of goods or passengers between U.S. ports to U.S. manufactured flagged vessels.  In addition, it maintains that 75% of the crew members must be U.S. citizens.  Also repair work of U.S. flagged vessels’ hulls and superstructures is limited to 10% of foreign built steel weight (1800JonesAct, 2008).  These restrictions are largely American protectionist policies.  These policies have a significant impact on the economy of the United States.  Since Hawaii is an island which relies on trade and commerce for subsistence, the Jones Act has severe negative implications for the economy of Hawaii.

No reliable analyses of the economic benefits of U.S. maritime polices have been published.  Nor has there been a reliable study as to the benefits of a repeal of the Jones Act.  As a result, judgment of these policies must be made by their rationale and their specific impact on certain economic sectors. Unfortunately there is even less information available for the economic impacts on the State of Hawaii.  This paper will focus on the implications for the economy of Hawaii.  It will demonstrate that costs for moving cargo between U.S. ports is far higher than if such restrictions did not apply, and that this cost is passed on to the consumer.  It will also show that the U.S. shipbuilding industry has also suffered as a result of the Jones Act, and this it has prevented U.S. flagged ships from competing in international shipping.  In addition a focus will be on the final implications for Hawaii’s consumers who bear the burden of this failed economic policy.  Ultimately it will be shown what steps can be taken to reverse the negative impacts of the Jones Act and make Hawaii a prosperous state.  Conclusions will be drawn from the general impact of the cabotage law on the United States and its effects on Hawaii.

The Hawaiian Merchant leaves San Francisco Bay on Aug. 31, 1958, with 20 24-foot containers on its deck. The Matson ship inaugurated container shipping in the Pacific. Photo: Matson Navigation Co.

The Hawaiian Merchant leaves San Francisco Bay on Aug. 31, 1958, with 20 24-foot containers on its deck. The Matson ship inaugurated container shipping in the Pacific. Photo: Matson Navigation Co.

History and Purpose of the Jones Act

The intent and purpose of the Jones Act has been codified in the preamble of the Act itself:

  • It is necessary for the national defense and for the proper growth of its foreign and domestic commerce that the United States shall have a merchant marine of the best equipped and most suitable types of vessels sufficient to carry the greater portion of its commerce and serve as a naval or military auxiliary in time of war or national emergency, ultimately to be owned and operated privately by citizens of the United States; and it is declared to be the policy of the United States to do whatever may be necessary to develop and encourage the maintenance of such a merchant marine…(1800JonesAct, 2008)

The history of the Jones Act must be evaluated in its historical context.  At the turn of the century the United States was completing a process of development after overcoming the turmoil of the Civil War.  It was at this time that strong and viable merchant fleet became a political priority.  The British, known for a strong merchant fleet, were looked upon as a model because of their ascension to a position of dominant world power.  This was attributed to having a strong naval fleet.  Sir Walter Raleigh stated, “Whosoever commands the sea commands trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself” (McClintock, 2004).

Destroyers present include: USS Farquhar (DD-304), at left; USS Reno (DD-303), center; USS William Jones (DD-308), right center; and USS Hull (DD-330). Photographed by the Shura Studio, Honolulu. Courtesy of Charles Sass, 1979. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

Another development was the need for American military forces to have a dependable sea lift capability in time of defense.  This was realized during World War I.  The infant U.S. Navy did not possess the capability of performing this function, and thus relied on the civilian sector for the transport of military cargo to overseas destinations.

The volume of cargo and international trade for the U.S. merchant fleet had drastically decreased due to the economic decline and global turmoil caused by World War I.  Further complicating the ability of the U.S. merchant fleet to compete in international commerce were higher construction and operation costs. For example, in 1926 the comparative monthly crew costs for ships of equal size were: $3,270 for the United States; $1,308 for Great Britain; and $777 for Japan.  Historically, the United States curbed the impact of such issues through cabotage laws, which are government measures used to protect or foster a domestic shipping industry by reserving all or a portion of international sea commerce to ships which fly the national flag (McClintock, 2004).

Cabotage laws were first introduced with the Shipping Act of 1916. The Shipping Act stated that only citizens of the United States, or companies in which a controlling interest was held by a citizen of the United States, could own a U.S. vessel. Additionally, the secretary of transportation had strict control over the transfer and chartering of U.S. vessels to foreign companies, and it provided for the regulation of rate agreements to avoid rate wars.  Subsequently, Congress passed the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, which was arguably the nation’s most influential cabotage law (McClintock, 2004).

1800JonesAct. (2008). The Jones Act U.S.C. Title 46 (Recodified 2006). Retrieved November 21, 2008 from http://www.1800jonesact.com/maritime_statutes/default.asp

McClintock, M. (2004). Merchant Marine Act of 1920. eNotes.com. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/merchant-marine-act

Finer Points Must Be Addressed for Hawaii’s Future Freedom

By Daniel Brackins and Dan Douglass

On Monday Governor Lingle issued her State of the State address. Politically she came across well and sensible. To her credit she connected with the public much more-so than last April when her address to the Hawaii Economic Association sparked our initial Economic Reality Check for Governor Lingle. Some things we agree with and others we don’t. Finer points must be addressed.

In her speech there were a few surprises. She called for energy independence (not a surprise) and food self-sufficiency (surprise). This is an admirable goal since the premium cost of food is an unnecessary burden for Hawaii’s people. Yet she failed to mention that Hawaii’s high cost of food is caused by two primary factors: the shipping monopoly (resulting from no Hawaii exemption from the Jones Act) and food tax. Food is an item that the consumer has no choice but to buy. Food is a necessity for life, and yet the state taxes this. The Governor must concert efforts, based on the understanding that under our current economic conditions many could use the additional 4% in their pockets.

Urging various state departments to buy local produce seems a well start, but skirts the basic problem of how the once booming agricultural industry has been incrementally destroyed in our state by the shipping monopoly. The consequence of state departments paying premium costs for local goods will increase the cost of the various departments (unless the departments are downsized) that ultimately all the taxpayers of Hawaii pay for.

The basic flaw is common in the bureaucratic mindset from county to federal. It is the false assumption that consumption/consumerism is the answer; this mantra of economic stimulus through liquidity. But where does the flow come from? It’s taken from the productive sector that generates voluntarily growing stimulus (through the free exchange of goods and services) that must be left alone as much as possible. To punish the productive sector by urging consumption on the state departmental level is utter nonsense that in effect continues to “kick the can down the road” for the longer term.

Lingle also called for a reduction in government services and pay cuts for government employees (surprise). We agree that this is a necessary step. There is a huge amount of overlap and duplication of government services. We recommend that the governor create a special task force (at no taxpayer cost) to eliminate overlap, improve efficiency, and reduce waste. We feel that this alone would eliminate the state’s projected $1.8 billion deficit.

Ultimately lasting wealth will come from entrepreneurial determination. This is something creative that almost always dies once government’s sticky fingers or iron fists get in on the action. Thus it takes courageous leadership to outsource, streamline and sunset governing agencies out of the productive sector’s way as much as possible.

Thus we stand firmly opposed to the Governor’s proposal to delay, curtail, or eliminate tax credits, exemptions or deductions. Tax cuts will allow the additional money in the consumers’ and investors’ pockets to help stimulate the economy through additional purchasing power. Moreover every proposal for tax reform should be evaluated apart from the typically exaggerated claims. How to think about any given tax reform? Here are four rules:

  • 1) If a bill reduces taxes through lower rates or increased deductions, it should be supported;
  • 2) If a bill increases taxes through raising rates or repealing deductions, it should be opposed;
  • 3) If a bill includes tax increases as well as tax reductions, it’s intellectually incoherent and therefore probably a trick;
  • 4) If a bill promises to reduce taxes and increase revenue, it should be rejected out of hand.

While we agree that a deferral of the transit tax on Oahu should be an option, it does not go far enough. The transit tax should be eliminated for similar reason stated above. Transit tax collections have already dropped by 16% since last year, a total of $2.6 million. This is in opposition to what the planners had anticipated when they claimed revenue would continue to rise each year. This makes funding the rail system without raising taxes unrealistic. We believe that the whole rail project itself should be scrapped. In the current state of economic crisis on all bureaucratic levels, Hawaii productive taxpayer base (the real golden goose) cannot finance the Honolulu Rail Cartel’s monstrosity.

Once again we must reiterate that she reconsider her own five-point economic plan. Our own plan to stimulate Hawaii’s economy would include the following:

  • Offer large tax incentives to business- this would include eliminating the corporate income tax or, at the very least, largely reducing it. This would include all industries, leaving none out. Incentives for small business development must also be explored.
  • Lowering the tax burden- a reduction of taxes across the board including the GE tax. Taxes magnify the cost of doing business in Hawaii.
  • Personalization of services- by eliminating wasteful state run services, such as the Department of Human Services (as an example), and outsourcing to non-profits, government spending can be largely reduced. This will also help with the previous point of tax reduction.
  • State exemption from the Jones Act- this would effectively terminate the shipping monopoly and lower the cost of goods substantially.
  • Free trade zones- by allowing tax free, tariff free, and duty free goods to be exchanged in Hawaii, the state could become a trading hub in the center of the Pacific connecting many areas of the world.
  • Marketing to outside business- with large incentives for business, the state should market on the mainland and in other countries in order to bring business to Hawaii.

Both Hawaii Republican and Democratic Party politicians must shun the temptation of enriching friends, families and allies at the expense of the families and businesses on the brink of moving to economically freer states or nations. Our Hawaii’s future freedom demands these bold measures from all our leadership that generates incentive for success and eliminates corruption.

Governor Linda Lingle’s 2009 State of the State Address

Senate President Hanabusa, Speaker Say, Lt. Governor and Mrs. Aiona, former Governor Ariyoshi, former Governor Waihe‘e and Mrs. Waihe‘e, members of the Legislature, cabinet members, Chief Justice Moon, Chair Apoliona, Mayor Tavares, Mayor Kenoi, military leaders, members of the Consular Corps, distinguished guests, and to the people of Hawai‘i…good morning and aloha!

It is a great privilege and a humbling experience to come before you each year to share my thoughts about where our state stands, and where we are headed.

The annual State of the State Address is a time-honored tradition in states all across our great nation.

It is a time to take stock of where we are as a state, to recognize a few successes, and to lay out a clear roadmap for our future.

In this sense, it is a fairly typical speech.

But this has not been a typical year. We are facing a time like no other in our state’s history.

And 2009 will be one of the most challenging years in our nation’s history as we confront one of the severest economic crises we have ever faced.

The daunting task we face in the months ahead is making some very difficult decisions in order to address our immediate fiscal problems.

These are not decisions that any of us want to make, but they are decisions that must be made.

They are the same kinds of decisions being made across our state by individuals, families, businesses and organizations as they too confront a near-term future with substantially fewer financial resources, and a high degree of uncertainty.

I’m an optimist by nature…and as Winston Churchill said, “An optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.”

So, I come before you today with a clear understanding of the enormity of what we face in the near term, but still enthusiastic about planning for our future together and optimistic about Hawai‘i in the 21st century.

Together we will meet both our near-term and long-term obligations by making those decisions necessary to navigate through the turbulence of the current fiscal crisis and achieve our preferred future.

That future includes energy independence, increased food self-sufficiency, and a 21st-century infrastructure that supports existing and emerging industries.

Our future also includes a well-cared for environment that increases recreational opportunities across the state.

We cannot afford to merely hunker down and muddle through the next year or two.

This is a time for us to work together to address the immediate reality, while searching for those opportunities that will enable us to emerge from this situation stronger than ever.

This dual effort will take patience and courage because there will be those who want to ignore reality and continue spending at current levels.

And others who only want to deal with our immediate revenue shortfall while deferring any talk of the future.

Either approach would leave us far short of meeting our duty to the people of Hawai‘i – a duty both to live within our means and position ourselves for a brighter future.

As we face this historic challenge, it is easy to forget how much success we have enjoyed in recent years.

I want to review the solid progress we have made in several areas, including home ownership and helping those most in need.

Since May of 2006 we have built nine new emergency shelters and transitional housing projects that provide safe and clean places to live for many who previously could only find a night’s rest in our parks, beaches, doorways or in their cars.

Nearly 2,800 people, including hundreds of children, have received not only safe shelter, but social services and an outpouring of community support to help them transition from homelessness to self-sufficiency.

It took many people to achieve so much in just two-and-a-half short years. I want to thank our entire community for embracing and helping those who had lost all hope.

In an attempt to address a completely different kind of housing need, we’re all aware of the success the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands has had.

They’ve awarded more land to their beneficiaries than at any time in the history of the trust, and we all enjoy seeing families who have waited for decades finally receiving their homesteads.

But there’s a much larger DHHL story that will be fully revealed in the years ahead.

It is the story of a native Hawaiian agency that has chosen to meet its fiduciary duty to its beneficiaries by leading in a way that benefits the larger community of Hawai‘i.

Whether it’s their pivotal role in the $110 million Kroc Center, development of the future DeBartolo regional mall, kick-starting the infrastructure UH West O‘ahu needed in order to move forward, or being the first state department to move its entire O‘ahu operation to the Second City of Kapolei, DHHL has chosen to lead.

We now look to them as an important and integral part of our economic recovery, and as an example of how to develop desirable communities.

They are even blazing their own trail in our state’s efforts to achieve energy independence and provide a clean energy future for the generations that will follow.

Few could have envisioned six years ago the heights to which DHHL and the Hawaiian Homes Commission would soar.

I believe their well-recognized success has been achieved partly because of how they contributed to the broader community.

DHHL is not just about building homes, it is about building great communities.

And they have succeeded because they have demanded more of themselves and their beneficiaries.

The bottom line is that they have chosen to lead, not follow…and what a joy it has been to watch their transformation and ongoing journey.

I want to personally thank the DHHL staff and those who have served on the Hawaiian Homes Commission for showing us all what great things can be achieved when you recognize we are all part of one ‘ohana.

An important part of that ‘ohana is Hawai‘i’s keiki, especially those who are most vulnerable.

Two remarkable trends have occurred in Hawai‘i’s child welfare system since 2005.

The first is a 50 percent decline in the number of children in state care, to just 1,500 children, which is the lowest number since 1993.

At the same time, Hawai‘i’s child re-abuse rate also dropped by half to just 3.1 percent, which is one of the lowest re-abuse rates in the United States.

These positive trends were the result of a fundamental shift in the state’s approach to child welfare.

The Department of Human Services previously removed children from the custody of their biological parents at a rate four times higher than the national average, with no improvement in safety outcomes.

Today, DHS, and its community partners, uses a comprehensive assessment system to carefully weigh the risk factors in a child’s family environment, and ensure that they receive much-needed social services.

Director Lillian Koller has received national recognition for these and other achievements.

In November of last year, Governing Magazine honored her as a “Public Official of the Year” for widespread improvements at the Department of Human Services, including the overhaul of the child welfare system.

This was the first time a public official from Hawai‘i has won this prestigious national award.

I know Lillian believes that this success would not have been possible without our many outstanding social service agency partners as well as her own committed staff. Mahalo to all of you.

No matter how noteworthy these and other achievements may be, recent reductions in revenue forecasts mean that they and other worthy programs will take a back seat to our more immediate need to balance the budget.

Today’s struggling economy has created a deep hole in our budget that we need to dig out of this session.

The Council on Revenues has never in its history lowered its projections by so much in such a short period of time.

Over the past eight months, the Council has reduced its general fund revenue projection by $1.4 billion.

This downward projection reflects an unprecedented decline in tourism, construction, business activity, and consumer demand brought about by national and international events beyond our control.

These events – including sub-prime lending, frozen credit markets and volatile oil and other commodity prices – will impact us for at least the next couple of years.

Climbing our way out of this hole won’t be easy.

It won’t be quick.

It won’t be without pain; but it will be done.

The pain that will be felt by individuals and organizations both in and out of government will cause some to search for a specific reason or person to blame.

When a recently retired couple watches the value of its 401K drop dramatically…or a family struggles to make the mortgage payment now that their work hours have been cut back…or a social service agency faces the need to lay off employees because the government reduces the purchase of a service contract they were counting on…it is natural to want to understand why this is happening, and to hold someone accountable.

But we must refrain from playing the blame game because we know this downturn was not caused by any of us.

And we know we had been making good decisions in recent years to create a brighter future for Hawai‘i’s people by lowering taxes, increasing science and math education, moving toward energy independence, and preserving more of our natural and cultural resources.

We also know that we are all in this together, and it is only by sticking together that we will be able to deal effectively with the immediate fiscal crisis and strengthen our economy in the long run.

We will need a mixture of courage, compassion, and collaboration to cope with the unprecedented budget gap we face.

Collaboration doesn’t mean we will see all issues the same way, it means that for the sake of Hawai‘i’s future, we must acknowledge our predicament and find an acceptable way to move ourselves forward.

In order to do this, we must start by accepting the fact that in this new economic and fiscal environment, there is simply no possible way to continue operating and spending the way we have.

Although I am extremely optimistic about Hawai‘i’s long-term prospects, I am not going to sugarcoat the immediate challenge we face.

In order to maintain the public’s confidence and trust, we must be open and honest about the nature and magnitude of what we are facing.

The reality is that we will have to make some unpopular choices that will reduce some services and cause others to be delivered in a different way.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

A number of projects will likely be delayed, curtailed, or possibly eliminated.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

We will have to ask government employees, like those who work in the private sector, to accept some reduction in wages and benefits.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

Some who currently enjoy special tax credits, exemptions and deductions will see them reduced or eliminated.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

This is a time of shared sacrifice when everyone must be willing to give up something.

This is a time when we must rely on each other, because no one is coming to rescue us.

We must also keep in mind that the economy will likely continue to soften in the near-term, perhaps causing the Council on Revenues to further reduce projections at its March meeting and then again in May after the budget is adopted.

We are not alone in facing this new reality and near-term uncertainty.

Families and businesses across the country and throughout our state have had to come to terms with this same situation.

But we should also recognize that the difficulty we face is temporary.

Our nation will regain its economic footing, and so will Hawai‘i.

How fast we recover here at home will depend to some degree on the decisions we make during this session.

Our solutions need to be decisive enough to address our immediate situation, but just as important, must prepare the way for our future.

Short-term solutions that merely defer the hard choices to those who will follow us are just as bad as no solutions at all.

We can’t meet our responsibility by kicking the can down the road.

We must make meaningful choices now that address the reality we face today while laying the foundation for a better future.

That better future is one that transitions us from an economy over-reliant on land development to one that is innovation-driven and relies on the capacity of our people.

A key area where we must bring innovation to bear is ending our over-reliance on imported foreign oil.

Oil pollutes the environment, it sucks billions of dollars out of our economy, and leaves us dependent on the goodwill of foreign countries and companies for our very survival.

We remain today the most oil-dependent state in America, but we have made great strides over the past few years.

Today windmills hum atop Kaheawa Ridge on Maui delivering clean, plentiful power and displacing the need to import 220,000 barrels of foreign oil each year.

On Lana‘i, a 10-acre solar farm now provides 30 percent of the island’s peak power needs.

A geothermal project on the Big Island that currently provides power for 30,000 homes is in discussions to increase its output by 50 percent.

And on O‘ahu, engineers are already figuring out where we will be plugging in the electric cars coming to dealer showrooms in the near future.

Last year we entered into a unique partnership with the federal Department of Energy called the Hawai‘i Clean Energy Initiative or HCEI.

It established the goal of a 70 percent clean energy economy by 2030.

HCEI experts from government, national labs, our military, utilities, universities and the private sector have recommended specific actions to achieve the 70 percent clean energy goal through indigenous renewable resources and energy conservation.

My administration and legislators will introduce several bills based on these HCEI recommendations.

These changes will significantly increase energy efficiency in our commercial buildings and residences, give consumers more control over their energy costs, transition us to alternative fuel vehicles, such as electric cars, and ban new fossil fuel power plants in Hawai‘i.

When adopted, these proposals will form the basis for Hawai‘i’s transformation to one of the world’s first economies based primarily on clean energy.

Implementing these policy changes will require a large measure of collaboration as we will need public funding, assistance from county governments, conservation by citizens, and investment by the business community.

To successfully transition to a clean energy economy, we will need the involvement of our entire community, alignment of our efforts, and a continual focus on our objectives.

I expect there will be a fair amount of spirited debate about the specific energy choices we should make, but if we recognize that we cannot go back to where we were, then I believe the choices are clear.

We can either work together toward a clean energy future or continue to operate in a business-as-usual fashion that will leave Hawai‘i vulnerable to the vagaries of world oil prices and the whims of foreign countries and companies.

As the world’s most isolated set of islands and our nation’s most oil-dependent state, a clean energy future is no longer simply a desire of environmentalists, it is an absolute necessity for our long-term economic survival.

This energy transformation is something we owe to future generations, and something they have a right to expect.

They have a right to expect energy security.

They have the right to expect stable and lower energy costs, and a cleaner environment.

They have the right to expect higher-paying, green-collar jobs that come with a thriving new energy sector.

And they have the right to expect us to stop sending up to $7 billion a year out of Hawai‘i to buy foreign oil, instead of keeping most of it here at home, to circulate in our economy.

Over the past 12 months, remarkable progress has been made toward achieving a secure energy future for our state, and we are being hailed as a national model because of our effort.

We must remain steadfast in our pursuit of energy independence and security, regardless of fluctuating oil prices.

Another area in which we must decrease our over-reliance on outside sources of supply is the food we eat.

We import 85 percent of everything we consume.

We need to take action now to increase Hawai‘i’s food self-sufficiency and strengthen and preserve agriculture for future generations as required by our State Constitution.

We must increase our efforts to protect the best agricultural lands from development.

And, we must strengthen our commitment to provide affordable water for agriculture.

Increasing our food self-sufficiency will contribute to the state’s economic recovery by keeping more of our money here at home.

If we replace just 10 percent of the food we currently import, it would create more than $300 million in economic activity, generate $6 million in taxes, and create 2,300 new jobs.

I will be asking state agencies such as schools, prisons and hospitals to take the lead by purchasing locally grown fruits, vegetables, poultry, eggs and meat.

Under new rules, Hawai‘i farmers will receive a 15 percent price preference when placing their bids for state purchases.

If we each make an effort to buy more locally produced food we will be contributing to our economic recovery, helping Hawai‘i farmers lower their unit costs, and protecting our open spaces.

Agriculture keeps Hawai‘i green, it recharges our aquifers and promotes a healthy lifestyle and good nutrition for families.

It also diversifies our economy and supports small businesses and rural communities.

Another requirement for a strong and innovative economy is an advanced communications infrastructure that will serve as the backbone for connecting us to the global economy.

This 21st century infrastructure is essential to creating the kind of high-paying jobs we are striving for in the coming years.

The communications infrastructure we have in place today barely meets our current needs.

We need to be planning for tomorrow’s needs.

We shouldn’t be limited in our thinking to believe that what we have in place today is acceptable.

We need to dream about tomorrow, and begin now to lay the groundwork for getting there.

We need a communications infrastructure that will allow us to achieve competitive advancements in the areas of: education, health care diagnosis and treatment, public safety, research and innovation, civic participation, creative media, e-government, and the foundation for overall economic development.

We have been working with the Legislature’s Broadband Task Force to craft a bill that recognizes the convergence of technologies that are used to provide voice, data and video services through wireline, wireless, cable and satellite communication.

The bill consolidates regulation and advocacy of communication services under one agency, a new Hawai‘i Communications Commission, in order to make attainable the latest communications services at the earliest possible time.

The Commission will not increase the size of government.

It will be funded from existing fees, and will focus on achieving specific goals, including: creating broadband access on a competitive basis at reduced prices…streamlining the permitting process…and providing access to businesses and residents by 2012 at prices and speeds that will make us a world leader and a place that will attract investment, while empowering our residents with enhanced communications capability.

This exciting, high-tech proposal couldn’t have moved forward without the hard work over the last two years of the Broadband Task Force, and I applaud the Legislature for the foresight shown in establishing it.

Although I have been discussing ideas that will position us well for the future, I think you would agree that the problem that bothers residents the most today is the everyday annoyance of sitting in traffic.

Sitting in a seemingly endless line of cars, burning expensive fuel, missing an appointment or your child’s soccer game, is not the way any of us want to spend our time.

The status quo has become intolerable, so we have joined with legislators in proposing a six-year, multi-island, Highways Modernization Plan to address known traffic problems with proven solutions.

This plan is intended to save lives…save time…and save money.

The program combines road building, highway and bridge safety improvements, anti-congestion traffic management, and a pavement maintenance program, in addition to safety legislation and increased public outreach and education.

The bulk of the near-term projects will be started using existing funds and anticipated federal fiscal stimulus funding.

The longer-term projects will be paid for by increases in highway-related taxes and fees that would be triggered at a future date if steady job growth indicates that our economy is growing again.

In other words, we will have a plan in place that is ready to go to construction when our economic situation improves. This innovative recommendation to tie future increases to measurable economic results in order to address a long-festering problem is the kind of creative approach being used by departments and agencies throughout government.

I have challenged every one of our departments to find new and creative ways to improve our quality of life in these tough economic and fiscal times.

The Department of Land and Natural Resources has risen to this challenge, and developed a comprehensive proposal to renew our state parks, small boat harbors and trails as well as the very way we care for these precious places – a true “Recreational Renaissance” that will benefit all residents and visitors.

The heart of the plan is $240 million in capital improvements over five years for both land- and ocean-based recreation.

The Department will fund this innovative plan by dedicating rents from some existing commercial properties to pay debt service, and developing now-vacant industrial and commercial lands that will fulfill the high demand for light industrial spaces in areas suitable for those uses.

Additional funding to support maintenance and operations will be generated from leases and concessions in parks and harbors combined with a small entry fee paid by visitors at a limited number of high-destination parks.

The plan’s final piece is the development of new land and ocean recreational opportunities through a public-private partnership to develop the long-proposed Ke‘ehi Lagoon Triangle adjacent to Lagoon Drive in Honolulu.

This centerpiece initiative will include 119 acres of light industrial space as a long-term source of revenue, coupled with new marina slips, canoe club storage and practice areas, boat ramps, storage and dry docks, beach parks and picnic areas.

I want to thank the staff at DLNR, DBEDT and Budget and Finance who developed this creative and comprehensive proposal which creates brand new, non-tax revenues and a better way of managing and caring for our recreational, natural and cultural resources.

It’s sure not business as usual at DLNR!

Working together, we can set the stage for this long-overdue “Recreational Renaissance” that will provide residents and visitors across our state with new and better recreational areas that are well-maintained, secure and enriching.

I am especially enthused about working with the Legislature on this and other proposals as a colleague rather than an adversary.

I will do more than reach across the aisle; I will walk across the aisle, and my door will always be wide open to you.

Our collaboration will demonstrate to the people of Hawai‘i that when history called on us to do so, we rose to the occasion.

I firmly believe that only by working together can we produce the kind of significant results that will enable us to exit this temporary downturn, and to position our economy for a stronger and more sustainable future.

Before concluding I want to take a moment to speak about the case pending before the United States Supreme Court involving the issue of ceded lands.

The issue involved in this case is not whether ceded lands should or should not be sold.

Rather the issue involves the fundamental question of whether the State of Hawai‘i has clear title to the land transferred to us by the federal government at the time of statehood.

The roots of this case date back to a decision made by former Governor Waihe‘e in the 1980s to sell certain ceded lands on Maui and Hawai‘i for the construction of affordable housing.

It was a decision he believed was in the best interest of all the people of Hawai‘i.

It is a decision that former Governor Cayetano defended in court because he believed it was in the best interest of all the people of Hawai‘i to do so.

And it is a decision that we are appealing to the United States Supreme Court because I believe it is in the best interest of all the people of Hawai‘i.

Acting in the best interest of all the people is the same standard I applied when supporting the Akaka Bill, fighting to protect federal programs benefiting native Hawaiians, or expediting Hawaiian Homestead leases.

And I will continue to advocate for these issues in the coming years just as passionately as I have in years past.

I call upon all who cherish what is the essence of Hawai‘i to come together with a willingness to understand and respect the nature of this case and its importance to the future of our state.

Our current fiscal crisis and the ceded lands issue arise during the same year that we commemorate our 50th anniversary as a state.

It is a time when we can reflect on just how unique we are among the 50 states.

But it is more importantly a time to remind ourselves that regardless of the short-term decisions we must make in this moment of economic difficulty, we should remain firmly anchored on the sure footing of Hawai‘i’s rich culture, diverse heritage and sometimes complicated history.

Governors of Japanese, Hawaiian, and Filipino descent have delivered State of the State addresses at this very podium.

Hawai‘i elected the first Asian American to the United States Senate.

And, less than a week ago, Hawai‘i’s heart swelled with pride as one of its own, Barack Obama, became the first African American to take the presidential oath of office when he was sworn in as our nation’s 44th president.

We have so much to be proud of in our history, and so much to look forward to in the coming years.

We are indeed the most unique among all the 50 states, and we are certainly capable of meeting this current challenge.

In my heart, I know that if we work together to make these difficult budget decisions, the people of Hawai‘i will understand that these weren’t the decisions we wanted to make but that we had to make.

The people of Hawai‘i are counting on us to lead our state through this unprecedented time – and that is exactly what we are going to do.

When the curtain comes down on our time on this stage, I want our collective legacy to win reviews as a story of pulling together for the good of all rather than being written off as a cast of characters who was each acting in their own one-man show.

If we deal decisively with the current crisis while keeping our eyes open to the opportunities that these kinds of challenging times create, then the people of Hawai‘i will conclude that we have lived up to our obligation.

Now, let’s get to work.

Quotable Slom

by admin | January 21, 2009 | In Hawaii politics, Quotable No Comments

This session we pledge to the people of Hawaii who look to all of us for leadership, to listen even more, work even harder, cooperate for the good of all our people, and to passionately continue to stand up against bad laws, poor economics and loss of freedom and choice.

~ Sam Slom, Senate Minority Speech (01/21/09)

Hawaii’s been good to me… the great thing about democracy in Hawaii is that now the maka’ainana (commoner) have a shot.  We all have a voice in the process.

~ Al Harrington

Republican National Committee leaders are pushing a resolution accusing President George W. Bush and congressional leaders of embracing socialism.  Ralph Z. Hallow of the Washington Times covers this story.

“We can’t be a party of small government, free markets and low taxes while supporting bailouts and nationalizing industries, which lead to big government, socialism and high taxes at the expense of individual liberty and freedoms,” said Solomon Yue, an Oregon member and co-sponsor of a resolution that criticizes the U.S. government bailouts of the financial and auto industries. Republican National Committee Vice Chairman James Bopp Jr. wrote the resolution and asked the rest of the 168 voting members to sign it.

The question locally is will local Hawaii Republicans active and dormant rally around the growing nationwide cause to support personal freedom and oppose expansive local bureaucracy Hawaii Republican leadership has either promoted or turned a blind eye to?

Will the HRP display any red in 2009?

Will the HRP display any red in 2009?

Derek DePledge wrote this article in the Honolulu Advertiser on the latest local developments in gubernatorial campaign fund-raising.

Observers have speculated that the national donor restriction was passed by lawmakers to limit Lingle’s coffers in 2006.  Now that 2010 is shaping up to be competitive primary and general elections legal manipulations that further jerk around the election process would come as no surprise.  If the restriction is lifted a nationally connected potential gubernatorial candidate like democratic Congressman Neil Abercrombie could tap into his big national special interest donors and Barack Obama connections to overcome his severe unattractive image disadvantage to possible opponents Ed Case, Colleen Hanabusa and Duke Aiona.

By Bobbie Slater

First, thank you to everyone who helped the initiative effort. Being on the ballot gave us good visibility with the press, and made 140,000 people aware of the fact that they don’t want rail transit. What a huge success!

A month had passed since the election, and there is much happening on the rail transit front.

Several important local organizations are making their voices heard loud and clear:

·         Na Leo Pohai, the public policy affiliate of The Outdoor Circle has done excellent research on the DEIS and the “concerns” they have raised should have everyone up in arms.

* Hawaii’s 1,000 Friends is equally upset, and has written a very forceful critique of the project.
* The Hawaii chapter of the American Institute of Architects is in opposition to the elevated structure downtown and has done an eloquent and well thought out paper on their concerns
* The League of women Voters has voiced their opposition to this project from the start.

All of these organizations are in favor of public transportation, but given this particular rail transit project, with its huge cost and unparalleled environmental blight, have felt compelled to speak out.

Honolulutraffic.com, which has always been the research arm of the stop rail initiative will continue to be the “mother ship” of the movement with the aim of continually educating the public on the most important public works issue in our history, and what the real solutions are.

Currently, we are working on a detailed response to the Federal Transit Administration on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. It is very important that you all prepare statements to them as well.

This is truly a grassroots effort of real people, as we saw in yesterday’s morning Advertiser. Go Rail Go and the other pro rail groups all received their money from big developers including Infraconsult and Parsons Brinkerhoff. The donations to stoprailnow were all from individuals – concerned citizens like you.

We want to reach out to all of the 140,000 new supporters who voted against rail in the election in any way possible.

Starting within our group, ask everyone you know that voted against rail to do two things.

1.      Make sure that you and everyone you know who is opposed to rail are members of honolulutraffic.com. It’s easy. Just go to honolulutraffic.com, click on “who we are” and add your name to the many that are there. It is important as we go forward that we represent thousands of Honolulu citizens who realize that this boondoggle will unalterably ruin our Honolulu. All stoprailnow people should also be honolulutraffic.com members.

2.      Ask people to respond to the DEIS. They do NOT have to be versed in the document itself.

Merely ask people to write to the Federal Transit Administration and express whatever concerns they have. The huge issues of course are the elevated rail downtown and the visual blight that will result, and the environmental justice issue of the most regressive tax in the country used to fund the project.

These letters should be emailed or postmarked on or before January 7th and addressed to:

Mr. Wayne Y. Yoshioka

Department of Transportation Services

City and County of Honolulu

650 South King Street, 3rd Floor

Honolulu, HI 96813

808-768-8303

Email: wyoshioka@honolulu.gov

Mr. Ted Matley

FTA Region IX

201 Mission Street, Suite 1650

San Francisco, CA 94105

415-744-3133
Email: ted.matley@fta.dot.gov.

In addition, it would be most helpful if copies were sent to:

Governor Linda Lingle

Executive Chambers

Hawaii State Capitol

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Email: Governor.Lingle@hawaii.gov

City Council members:

http://www.co.honolulu.hi.us/council/ccl.htm

These letters don’t need to take much time. Ask people to speak from the heart. As always, we are available to answer questions any time.

Our very best wishes to everyone for this Holiday Season. We hope the New Year brings to you, and to our Honolulu, only the best.

By Panos Prevedouros

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) of the City’s proposed rail system is the document that should provide answers to all reasonable impacts. It is available at all public libraries. It is also available at the city’s website honolulutransit.com along with a lot of the rail propaganda that your tax dollars paid for.

Below I list 20 simple but important questions. Does the DEIS answer them clearly?

  1. The bus routes will change. What happens to your route? What happens to express buses?
  2. Lanes will be taken away, some temporarily for construction and some permanently. Where are those lane closures and what is their duration? Are there traffic rerouting plans?
  3. Will there be bike racks on the train and where will they be located? Will bikes be allowed on the train? Will there be a place for surfboards? What about luggage? What about construction workers’ tools? Will there be a place for people to put large items they purchase at a big box retailer? What’s the size limitation?
  4. Will there be washrooms at the stations? How about convenience stores, vending machines? Will the platforms have seats? How many?
  5. Under land use, Aloun farms needs to relocate. Is that possible? Where will they go?
  6. A relatively simple job of sewer upgrades in Kailua and Kapiolani lead to the loss of businesses and jobs. Are details provided about similar effects during the construction of the rail?
  7. Is there a detailed plan for the effect of rail construction on water, sewer, gas and electric utilities? Will there be disruptions of service? Who pays for all these?
  8. About $107 million will be spent on the soft costs of this project. This “paperwork” cost is rather exorbitant for a single 20 mile rail line. How did $107 million get spent?
  9. The DEIS list of preparers for technical content shows that it was done almost exclusively with out-of-Hawaii engineers, planners and specialists. (See this document under Consultants: http://www.honolulutransit.org/library/files/end.pdf.) H-3 freeway was designed mostly with Hawaii based engineers. If Hawaii engineers are not able to design rail, who will supervise and build this unfamiliar-to-Oahu infrastructure?
  10. Rail construction involves unique skills and certifications that Hawaii construction workers do not have. How will this be addressed?
  11. The city has declared that in many cases only a portion of a parcel needs to be condemned and taken away. Can the business survive with the remaining portion? Are they forced to mandatory downsizing and some loss of employment?
  12. There are 16 schools that are adjacent to the alignment. Will the overhead structure, the continuous high current exposure and the intermittent noise and vibration affect the learning environment? Is it prudent to relocate the schools?
  13. Does rail fit our Hawaiian Sense of Place? How was the impact to tourism and local quality of life by a large elevated structure through town been assessed?
  14. Does the DEIS address the impacted vistas and scenery? Are the aesthetics of the structure and each station explained and presented adequately?
  15. What will happen in the event of a hurricane? Will the train operate? The train in Houston was shut down for 10 days due to hurricane Ike.
  16. BART in the Bay Area uses rail cars made of aluminum to combat corrosion. Is the city’s position that corrosion is not an issue?
  17. It appears that General Excise Tax surcharge proceeds for rail will be much lower than expected for at least four years in a row. How is this deficit going to be made up?
  18. If ridership turns out to be lower than forecast, then what? If the city is forced to provide free train rides like in Puerto Rico, how is the shortfall going to be covered?
  19. I heard that the Ala Moana station will now be at a lower elevation, at the west end of Kona Street and not above Nordstrom’s. What is the exact plan for the Ala Moana Center station and how is the train going to Waikiki and UH afterwards?
  20. Starting construction in Kapolei makes little sense. It may be expeditious and convenient but it is not smart. Why can’t a temporary rail yard be established near the airport or Aloha Stadium and build rail east into the city and west out to Kapolei simultaneously?

The billion dollar question that no DEIS could address is this: With President Obama at the helm and Senator Inouye chairing the Senate Appropriations Committee can we get four billion for rail? How about splitting the bill 50-50 with the feds? Other cities got a 50% or better federal match. Why does Honolulu get less than 25%?

These and many more questions require simple and clear answers.

In addition to the 429 page DEIS, the following files contain information and visuals. The City distributes them on a DVD.

  • Historic Resources.pdf
  • Land Use.pdf
  • Transportation Tech Report.pdf
  • Street Trees.pdf
  • Electric and Magnetic Fields Technical Report.pdf
  • Visual and Aesthetic Technical Report.pdf
  • Historic Appendix B.pdf
  • Cultural Resources.pdf
  • Economics.pdf
  • Geology, soils, farmlands, and natural hazardsTech Report.pdf
  • Haz Waste and Mat Tech Report Appendix A.pdf
  • Natural Resources.pdf
  • Noise&Vibration.pdf
  • Haz Waste and Mat Tech Report.pdf
  • tEISTravelForecasting ENTIRE.pdf
  • Community Impacts.pdf
  • Archaeological Resources.pdf
  • Water Resources.pdf
  • AQ&Energy.pdf

The City released this huge document just before the November 4 elections and in a period that includes the most holidays and days off. (The deadline for comment is January 7, 2009.) The hearings on the adequacy of the Alternatives Analysis were also conducted and concluded in the late November to late December 2006 period to make it as hard as possible for citizens to participate. (If it looks like a Banana Republic and acts like a Banana Republic …)

By Jimmy Kuroiwa

Leon Siu in his position on the “Hawaii Ceded Lands Case Rejoinder” initiates his position from the time of the Kingdom overthrow on January 17, 1893 and calls the overthrow an usurpation.

I present to him recorded Hawaiian historical data that leads anyone following the progression of events from 1874 through 1893, of some nineteen years, as the culmination of events that leads to the overthrow on January 17, 1893. The overthrow was inevitable and the overthrow of the Kingdom was supported by the citizens of Hawaii, including Native Hawaiians.

The overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom begins in 1874:

  • February 12, 1874: The legislative assembly elects Kalakaua king following death of Lunalilo on February 3, 1874. A riot by Native Hawaiians opposed the election of Kalakaua and supporters of Queen Emma, wife of Liholiho, preferred the election of Queen Emma. At the request of Kalakaua, the U.S. Minister ordered troops to be provided for peace from U.S.S. Tuscarora and U.S.S. Portsmouth. Peace was secured with U.S. troops. Kalakaua initial request were for troops from H.M.S. Tenedos where they landed after peace was secured. British Capt. Bay who was not available to receive Kalakaua’s request, in few months was relieved of command and retired.

King Kalakaua, Cabinet and Staff.

King Kalakaua (Kingdom of Hawaii Monarch, 1874-1891), Cabinet and Staff on the steps of Iolani Palace in Honolulu, HI.

  • April 30, 1874: The new government bldg (Aliiolani Hale) opened for public inspection with the opening of the first legislative session to be held in new building.
The Government Building or Aliiolani Hale in Honolulu, HI.

The Government Building or Aliiolani Hale in Honolulu, HI.

  • September 9, 1876: The Reciprocity Treaty was ratified and officially put into effect. It identified numerous products from Hawaii that would be allowed into the United States free of duty. Article IV was included to ensure that Hawaii would not seek favor from another power.
  • June 30, 1887: Conflicts between business and the Monarchy caused the adoption of a new Constitution to reduce powers of Monarchy and change the right to vote. This creates conflicts between Liliuokalani and Kalakaua for he was condemned for signing the constitution of 1887. Liliuokalani charged Kalakaua of cowardice. A conspiracy by R.W. Wilcox, C.B. Wilson, Sam Nowlien demanded that King Kalakaua abdicate the throne in favor of sister Liliuokalani.
  • April, 1889: Liliuokalani planned an insurrection by the League that was headed by R.W. Wilcox who formed the Rifle Club preparing for another revolution following the revolution of 1887.

Robert Wilcox

  • July 30, 1889: R.W. Wilcox and 150 armed men occupy the Palace and attempts to have Kalakaua proclaim that the 1864 constitution was to replace the 1887 constitution. Supporters of Kalakaua take up arms against insurgents. Volunteer riflemen turned out to support the Government (Missionary Party). A legation was on hotel premises where Mr. Merrill, the U.S. Minister requested a body of marines to be landed for a day. A duel between the insurgents and volunteers begins with artillery and rifle fire, by evening the fighting ends and the insurgents surrender.
  • June 17, 1890: Conservative appointments J.A. Cummins, C.N. Spencer, Godfrey Brown, and A.P. Peterson (Royalists) by Kalakaua were made to his cabinet.
  • January 29, 1891 Liliuokalani becomes queen (1891-1893) Kalakaua dies on 20 Jan 1891 while in San Francisco. Liliuokalani appoints C.B. Wilson as marshal of the Kingdom. C.B. Wilson begins a Kingdom scandal by openly supporting opium smuggling.
Queen Liliuokalani, Kingdom of Hawaii Monarch (1891-1893).

Queen Liliuokalani, Kingdom of Hawaii Monarch (1891-1893).

  • March 1892: An abortive revolution was led by the Ashford brothers and Robert W. Wilcox of the Liberal Party. The objective was to establish a Republic and then educate the people for future annexation to United States.
  • August 30, 1892: The first introduction of the lottery bill that was supported by Mr. C.B. Wilson, the appointed Kingdom marshal, and the bill was tabled due to strong opposition by the legislature.
  • September 1892: Liliuokalani and legislature are deadlocked on control because of differences on the opium and lottery bills. Three separate cabinets in succession were voted out by the legislature because they believed the cabinets were in sympathy with C.B Wilson, the Kingdom’s Marshal.
  • 1892: The annexationists feared that if Liliuokalani died and Kaiulani (whose Father was Archibald Cleghorn, governor of Oahu, a Scotsman), would bring a strong English influence into the palace. Wodehouse, the English minister, his son had married a half white sister of Kaiulani and several other sons held important political jobs.
  • 1892: Liliuokalani yields and appoints a conservative cabinet of G.N. Wilcox, P.C. Jones, Mark Robinson, and Cecil Brown.
  • January 9, 1893: Liliuokalani dismisses the G.N. Wilcox cabinet and Liliuokalani receives strong opposition from the legislature relating to the lottery and opium bills, and to a new Constitution. Liliuokalani appoints a new cabinet with John Colburn, W. Cornwell, Sam Parker, and Arthur Peterson under intense public indignation.
  • January 12, 1893: The lottery and opium license bills approved by the legislative body. The new cabinet was voted out, the lottery and opium bills approved after neighbor island legislative members, who opposed the bills, returned home.
  • January 13, 1893: Liliuokalani announced the presentation of the new constitution and schedules a public announcement of the new constitution for January 14, 1893.
  • January 14, 1893: Queen Liliuokalani proposes to promulgate a new constitution that would give her powers of virtually absolute monarch. She would take control of legislative, judicial as well as executive branch of government.
  • January 16, 1893: Marines and sailors from USS Boston come ashore to protect American property. The marines were sent to U.S. Embassy and the sailors to Arion Hall (Old Downtown Post Office).
Servicemen from USS Boston on duty at Arlington Hotel in Honolulu, HI at the time of the overthrow in January 1893.

USS Boston servicemen on duty at Arlington Hotel in Honolulu, HI (January 1893).

  • January 17, 1893: The Committee of Safety occupies Aliiolani Hale and Mr. Cooper reads the proclamation abrogating the monarchy and establishes the provisional government. Dole requests that Capt. Wiltse recognize new government. Minister Stevens then recognizes the new Provisional Government. Liliuokalani surrenders to United States and surrenders is under protest.

For most of us who are citizens of the State of Hawaii and the United States of America, the truth and history are most important.

I do not believe there is any fraud being perpetrated in the history of Hawaii and in particular in regards to the overthrow of the Monarchy on January 17, 1893.

Images from State of Hawaii Archives.

America fought in two wars to prevent the spread of communism in Korea and Vietnam, but now Hawaii allows communism to spread in it’s own state by the political process.

~ Li Zhao, Libertarian Party of Hawaii Chair

Leon Siu and Ken Conklin have weighed in for years on Hawaii’s sovereignty issues.  Their latest articles were released yesterday in the Hawaii Reporter.

Leon Siu article: Hawaii Ceded Lands Case Rejoinder

Ken Conklin’s article: Diplomatic, Military and Economic Threats to Hawaii Security

By Laura Brown

Every year in Hawaii, without fail, the Department of Education (DOE) announces to the media that it will have to make drastic cuts to sports, school bus transportation or even school lunches if forced to enact budget cuts as directed by the Governor. This year, the DOE threatened to cut Junior Varsity Sports to help make up for a $9.2 million state-mandated cut to the $2.5 billion budget. A reportedly emotional, four-hour board meeting ensued, with the mayor and other state representatives testifying against such a cut. Meanwhile, the DOE’s Chief Financial Officer admitted a $41 million carryover in unencumbered funds at the end of the 2007-08 fiscal year, but a review of unspent, unencumbered funds in May 2008 revealed a balance of well over $200 million.

Every year these DOE “cry wolf” tactics dupe the public into believing that Hawaii’s public education is under funded, but this time the Governor simultaneously released news that 651 DOE personnel recently attended a conference at a Disneyland Resort in Orlando, Florida at a cost of at least $1.2 million. In response, a flood of skeptical comments from the public filled the commentary sections of the daily newspapers.

How can the Board of Education (BOE) believe that it must cut programs while the DOE carries over hundreds of millions of dollars? How can the Legislature annually appropriate millions in emergency funds not knowing that the DOE has more than enough money in the bank? A past superintendent testified before a Ways & Means committee that the DOE Budget Office does not communicate with the Accounting Office. In other words, there may be a budget “shortfall” on paper, but expenditures are consistently less than budgeted.

In order to capitalize on recent media events, the public’s perception that government education is underfunded must be replaced with an understanding of how the DOE receives and spends its resources.

Laura Brown is an education writer and researcher who writes for Grassroot in Review, Hawaii Reporter, and other publications.

What concerns you most in Hawaii?

Economy

Education

Environment

Energy Supply

Homelessness

Native Hawaiian Issues

Traffic Congestion

Water Supply

Other

Editor’s note: originally published in Hawaii Reporter on Sept. 23, 2008.

By Daniel Brackins and Dan Douglass

With so much attention focused on the economy, Gov. Linda Lingle has finally taken the time to address this important issue in her article titled, “In Hawaii, A Time to Pull Together”, which was published in Hawaii Reporter on Sept. 22, 2008.

As opposed to her previous comments on mainland woes not applying to Hawaii’s economy she now admits that, “residents are feeling the impacts in the form of higher prices and even job losses.” She follows this with a plan to help Hawaii’s economy overcome its current problems. While we believe that her plan to implement a 4 percent restriction on discretionary spending for government departments is a step in the right direction, there is definitely much left to be desired in her proposed economic plan.

According to Gov. Lingle’s website her proposed five point economic plan includes:

  • Increased tourism outreach and marketing;
  • Investing in improvements to our infrastructure and state facilities;
  • Lowering business fees and providing tax relief;
  • Attracting outside investment, especially in renewable energies; and
  • Maximizing federal dollars and partnerships.

While these five points may seem fine on the surface we would like to point out a few flaws in each:

  • Increased tourism outreach and marketing- this seems like an obvious choice for an economy dependant on tourism. More tourists will equal more revenue; however, with a weakening national and global economy where will the tourists come from? Tourism will continue to decline in the state with a lack of confidence in the U.S. economy. Marketing and outreach may buffer the decline of tourists, yet how much money will these marketing programs cost and what is the cost benefit analysis? When has marketing ever been a viable foundational solution to a failing statewide economy?
  • Investing in improvements to our infrastructure and state facilities- how will spending tax money on state projects improve the economy? This is simply redistributing money from the productive sector of the economy to the unproductive sector. Government is not a productive sector, and therefore there will be no benefit.
  • Lowering business fees and providing tax relief- we agree that this could be beneficial to the economy. This begs the question of what fees will be lowered, and by how much. In addition, what kind of tax relief is proposed? Will these be low enough to attract out of state business from moving to Hawaii? If not, they do not go far enough.
  • Attracting outside investment, especially in renewable energies- this is a great idea; however, we must defer to the previous point. Will there be enough tax incentives for such businesses to be developed in the state?
  • Maximizing federal dollars and partnerships- we believe that using tax dollars from federal sources is once again a redistribution of money from the productive sector to the unproductive sector. How can Hawaii have a self sustainable economy if it is depending on tax money from the mainland to funds its projects? Also by having to create government partnerships with private business is a clear indicator that business has no incentive to relocate to Hawaii, and must be bribed with tax dollars to operate in our state.

Gov. Lingle also states that, “a key component includes developing our work force to ensure that people have the education, skills and knowledge needed to compete successfully in the global economy…” This is a great idea, but the reasoning is flawed. Hawaii can train a workforce with plenty of education, skills, and knowledge but how does the state plan to keep these workers from leaving the state and becoming economic refugees on the mainland?

There are few industries available for recent graduates and skilled workers to participate in. In addition salaries in Hawaii are about 10 percent less for the same job at the same sized company on the mainland. Couple that with higher prices on almost everything in Hawaii. The cost of living in Hawaii is 30 to 60 percent higher than the mainland, depending on family size.

The cost of consumables weighted to pricing patterns of grocery and drug store chains is as much as 66% more than the U.S. average depending upon family size, earnings level and spending. For example, a family of 4 renting in Honolulu needs to earn $111,695 or 55% more income to maintain a lifestyle similar to a comparable family earning $72,000 on the mainland.

While there is plenty of land to grow all the perishable foods Hawaii needs, the high cost of land, tax laws, leasing difficulties, labor, transportation, and water makes it unprofitable for agricultural businesses. Thus about 90% of our food is imported. With the Jones Act in place the cost of importing goods also increases the price for the consumer. Moreover increased pressure to use agricultural land for resort development helps to fuel the high cost of living in Hawaii.

In closing Gov. Lingle, “believe[s] that as a state we are on the right track in pursuing these long term goals.” We feel that she is off track and headed in the wrong direction leading the state to further economic downturn.

We received feedback regarding “Economic Reality Check for Governor Lingle Part III” and her latest economic address from a state employee who has closely followed economic trends in Hawaii and abroad since the 1970s:

“The way I read it, the [Lingle] editorial sounded like, ‘we only have a myopic view, which blinded us to external activities that would have a detrimental impact on our local economy.’”

Our own plan to stimulate Hawaii’s economy would include the following:

  • Offer large tax incentives to businesses- this would include eliminating the corporate income tax or, at the very least, largely reducing it. This would include all industries, leaving none out. Incentives for small business development must also be explored.
  • Lowering the tax burden- a reduction of taxes across the board including the GE tax. Taxes magnify the cost of doing business in Hawaii.
  • Personalization of services- by eliminating wasteful state run services and letting the free market run these, government spending can be largely reduced. This will also help with the previous point of tax reduction.
  • State exemption from the Jones Act- this would effectively terminate the shipping monopoly and lower the cost of goods substantially.
  • Free trade zones- by allowing tax free, tariff free, and duty free goods to be exchanged in Hawaii, the state could become a trading hub in the center of the Pacific connecting many areas of the world.
  • Marketing to outside business- with large incentives for business, the state should market on the mainland and in other countries in order to bring business to Hawaii.

These proposals are bold, but big problems require bold solutions. Our administration cannot continue on the same path, and must adopt these points for a viable and self sustainable Hawaii economy.

Last Saturday’s primary election demonstrated that Mayor Mufi Hannemann’s victory was not inevitable. In spite of his multi-million dollar war chest, the dedicated effort of several out-funded campaigns stopped his effort.

The Lingle administration can learn a lesson that dedicated efforts with the right foundational ideas can deter ‘inevitable’ economic doom.

By Dan Douglass

The Hawaii Republican Party held a “Victory 2008″ recap at headquarters Wednesday night with a handful of executive committee members, state committee members, elected representatives and challengers (all challengers lost).  Neighbor island members and campaigners engaged via conference call.  Representatives Corrine Ching, Kymberly Pine, Gene Ward and Barbara Marumoto who maintained their seats were present as was Colleen Meyer who lost her seat.  Rep. Lynn Finnegan who ran unopposed was present.  Rep. Cynthia Thielen was not present.  Neither any State Senators, the Governor nor Lt. Governor were present.  Former Representative Anne Stevens who was unsuccessful in her bid to reclaim her seat was present while former Representative Quinten Kawananakoa was not.

Besides the need to ‘Get Out the Vote’ and start campaigns earlier, Party Chair Willes Lee and Executive Director Adam Deguire, in my opinion, addressed nothing of party rebuilding substance that can be summed up in- let’s hope there’s no future ObamaWave.

Three questions were asked and moderated by Lester Morioka (a kind demeanored gentleman whom any upset attendees may have been less prone to tear into):  what the party did right, what the party did wrong and what should the party do now.

Rep. Ching, pressed for time, addressed the need for early candidate recruitment.

What did the party do right?

A couple of websites and consultants helping out a handful of races, some party dollars spread around and negative campaigning was the consensus on what the party did right.  On negative campaigning there was disagreement and a poll was taken.  Those in headquarters voted overwhelmingly that the negative campaigning was helpful with only four dissenting votes (I dissented).  On the neighbor island the majority consensus was opposed to negative campaigning.  Rep. Ward noted that the manner in which the negative campaigning is carried out can be more damaging for the candidates.

There was much discussion on what the party did wrong and what it should do now.

I’m going to cut to the heart of the matter: unless Governor Lingle’s self-serving suffocation over the local party’s true and diverse identity is overcome by concessions all the discussion is moot.  It would otherwise be more practical and effective for libertarians, moderates and even social conservatives (of all things) to en masse leave the HRP and get active in the Democratic Party of Hawaii to work with open-minded democrats for market oriented reform on the issues that effect Hawaii the most.

The following were the points I made in the meeting as HD31 chair.

What did the GOP do wrong this past election?

The Party did not have an overarching and unified message that candidates could refer to as Republican candidates.  No brand.

What should the Hawaii GOP do now?

82,000.  82,000 registered Hawaii voters turned out for Republican congressional districts 1 and 2 candidates Steve Tataii and Evan B. Rogers.  Hardly anyone in the meeting had ever met either of these candidates.  These 82,000 represent those in Hawaii that believe the most in the “R” next to a candidate’s name whoever they are.  These 82,000 are the base and are looking to party leadership because they want to believe and want to see Democrats, whoever they are defeated.  To these 82,000 the party’s leadership had a responsibility to and under the chairmanship of Willes Lee, beholden to Lingle, have failed.

But 82,000 times three equals Republican victory in every statewide (senatorial and gubernatorial) and individual congressional race.  The base must be energized.  There is a neighbor up North in Alaska who has energized the base across the nation.  Whether you like it or not Sarah Palin is now the party’s leader.  She owes it to Hawaii’s state party to visit Hawaii.  The party must deliver her soon and often to fill up the convention center or even the Aloha Stadium.  This would not only be an opportunity to energize the 82,000 but also the 40,000 more that voted for her on the presidential ticket.  This would be the draw for a tremendous recruiting and fundraising opportunity unlike anything else ever seen in Hawaii Republican history.  Energize the base.

Local cartoonist Corky Trinidad doesn’t blame the woes of the GOP on an “Obama-wave” (as local GOP chair, Willes Lee, did) in his latest Honolulu Star Bulletin cartoon editorial.

This article entitled “9 Ways to Save the Democratic Party” was written two years ago.  One of our columnists, Daniel Brackins, notes that the 9 points are essentially what the GOP should be doing to fill the void.

add topic