Posts Tagged ‘ Hawaii ’

At 0900 on Monday December 7th Chief U.S. District Judge David Ezra will hear a motion for preliminary injunction to lift excessive restrictions on shipping to and from Hawaii that substantially increase the cost of living in Hawaii. The hearing will be held in his courtroom on the fourth floor of the Federal Building.

So few understand the significance of his decision; it is vital that all who do attend show support for lifting restrictions imposed by the Jones Act. Those who understand, please carpool as many as you can in time to arrive and be seated before 0900 a.m.

Note Well: These Jones Act restrictions violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as well as the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Thank you,

Gayle Gardner on behalf of John Carroll Plaintiff Attorney

Related: John Carroll Files Lawsuit Against United States Government

John Carroll

John Carroll

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Media Contacts:

Barbara Hester – PR Coordinator  (808) 384-5907

Gayle Gardner – Campaign Chairman (808) 595-7127

Alice Paet-Ah Sing - Campaign Director (808) 542-2902

John Carroll – Candidate (808) 526-9111 (808) 545-3800 fax

Gubernatorial Candidate, John Carroll, Former State Senator and Former Chair of the Republican Party of Hawai‘i, announced today that he and Honolulu attorney Christopher Dias have filed a precedent setting law suit.  The suit requests for injunctive relief from the United States Government, relief from the provisions of the Jones Act, which created shipping restrictions that adversely apply to only one State in the Union; the island State of Hawai`i.  Carroll stated that the restrictions are excessively expensive for Hawai`i’s people and are in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as well as the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Carroll stated that he had originally intended to instruct his Attorney General to file a class action on behalf of the people of the State of Hawai`i when he took office as Governor.  He now states he sees no reason to delay.  Carroll believes in getting things done.  Carroll explained,  “One of the purposes of enacting the Jones Act was to ensure that the United States of America would be well equipped with a maritime fleet that could compete in a worldwide economy.  Unfortunately, it created unconstitutional restrictions on commerce between the State of Hawai`i and worldwide shippers as well as on interstate commerce.”

Since Hawai`i is separated from the continental United States by 2,300 miles of ocean and, of course, has no highways, railroads or pipelines from the continental United States, Hawai`i is dependent on ocean shipping for at least 90 percent of every commodity used and consumed in the state.

The Impact of the Jones Act on the People of Hawai‘i

The Jones Act requires that for a ship to operate in interstate commerce, (between states), it must be built in America, owned by Americans, 75 percent manned by an American crew, and maintained and flagged in the United States.  The net effect of the enforcement of the Jones Act on the State of Hawai‘i’s population has been wide-ranging.

Examples:  The expense of agricultural production became prohibitive, not only because of the inbound shipping cost of fertilizers, herbicides, and farm implements but also due to the outbound shipping costs for our locally grown fruits, livestock and ornamental plants.  Hawai‘i cattle ranchers are faced with an intolerable situation.  They often have to transport their cattle, from Kawaihae to Vancouver B.C. on a Canadian owned Corral Lines to remain profitable.  The cattle must then be trucked (often for 500 miles)  into the U.S. to be fattened and sold.  To go direct, some are flown on Boeing 747 aircraft.

There has emerged a monopolistic control of shipping in and out of the State of Hawai‘i, eliminating the cost reduction benefits of competition.  As will be shown at trial, the cost of everything from automobiles to paper towels is significantly higher because of the enforcement of the Jones Act provisions.

By comparison, the tiny islands of Singapore and Hong Kong, which do not have similar trade restrictions and with less than 1/20th the land mass of Hawai’i, enjoy a Gross Domestic Product in excess of two billion (2,000,000,000.00) U.S. dollars per year. That is 40 times greater than Hawai`i’s GDP of fifty million (50,000,000.00) U.S. dollars per year when government spending and tourism are excluded. This is an absurdity for Hawai‘i’s economic viability.

The Fundamental Purposes of the Commerce Clause

The fundamental purposes of the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution are, among others, “…to assure the unrestricted flow of commerce throughout the several states,” 282 NE2d 336,  “…to assure to the commercial enterprises in every state substantial equality to access to a free national market,” 517 P2d 691.  Further, the “…power granted is a positive power to legislate concerning transactions which, reaching across state boundaries, affect the people of more states than one, and to govern affairs which the individual states,with their limited territorial jurisdictions, are not fully capable of governing.” 322 US 533.  Clearly, the Jones Act and its provisions are in direct violation of the spirit of the Commerce Clause.

Holo I Mua

by admin | September 1, 2009 | In Uncategorized No Comments

Dan Douglass

Aloha Family, Friends and Colleagues:

A mass email was recently distributed to friends, colleagues and contacts of mine. It was a smear on Hawaii gubernatorial candidate John Carroll and more pointedly, me. Whether you’ve received it or not, I’m compelled to make these comments.

1) The individual who sent the smear was fired from the Carroll campaign this past July for a litany of reasons.

2) The individual who sent the smear has been under investigation by the City Prosecutor’s office for nearly a year (The Carroll campaign found out that the investigation was still active shortly after he was fired.). Because of the current investigation I will make no further comment on this matter.

3) The individual who sent the smear has a history promoting manipulated and rhetorically embellished conspiracy theories.

4) I have done nothing illegal.

5) My personal regret is ever having been associated with someone so bizarre and manipulative.

For the past two years I have involved myself neck-deep in local politics. I personally despise the word politics. Nevertheless, what I learned early on is that politics is well-over 50% relationships. The relationships I have sought and desire to keep and demonstrate are based upon earned trust in demonstrating honesty through doing what you say you’re going to do, when you say you’re going to do it through mutual agreement. I want to thank you for your calls and emails of concern, suggestion and inquiry.

Holo I Mua,

Dan Douglass

Aloha Hawaii Liberty lovers:

This Saturday is our nation’s 233rd year since declaring independence from the crown’s tyranny. In the middle of your activities, I encourage you to make some time this weekend to read or re-read the Declaration of Independence. Maybe a gem of insight about courage or justice will speak to you as happens whenever I read it.

http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/index.htm

Right now the Hawaii Campaign For Liberty’s legislative focus is putting pressure on Senator’s Inouye and Akaka to co-sponsor S604, the Senate companion to HR1207- Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed resolution that at last count has 245 co-sponsors.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.604:

The best way to keep current, network and receive training is through the official Campaign For Liberty website.

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/usa/HI/

Once you’ve joined the Campaign For Liberty in Hawaii, be sure to CHECK BACK OFTEN, log in and check your messages, and return to the state page (as well as your district and county pages)–the site is a social networking site for liberty lovers, and will be the best way for us to share information with you–but YOU’VE got to sign in so that you can read it.

Please mark your calendars for our next C4L BBQ/Meeting on Sunday, August 2 @ the Moana Pacific. A detailed invitation will be posted soon.

On a final note, the results we want to see in our civil polity are always in conflict with our impatience, but history teaches us hope.

“What is true of the individual will be tomorrow true of the whole nation if individuals will but refuse to lose heart and hope.” -Mohandas Ghandi.

Dan Douglass

Why does industry and commerce based on importing and exporting in Hong Kong and Singapore flourish while Hawaii spirals downwards?

Why do we pay so much more in Hawaii for everything shipped in when our central location should be a tremendous contribution to boom our economy?

Former State Senator, John Carroll, will address how a key protectionist law has not only restricted economic growth, but has deteriorated local productivity. Q & A to follow. $5 per guest for drinks and pupus.

Date:
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Time:
6:00pm - 8:00pm
Location:
Schoolland’s home
Street:
94-1072 Alelo St.
City/Town:
Waipahu, HI
Phone:
8086760825
Email:

By Russell McGuire

In the coming weeks, Congress will vote on a bill that will increase transparency of Government in the most crucial of areas, money creation.  H.R. 1207, the Audit the Fed Bill, will require the Federal Reserve Bank to disclose where it distributes newly created money.

Money creation by the Federal Reserve increases the prices we pay for goods by inflation. The more money created, the higher prices will go. The money supply has roughly doubled since we first embarked on bailing out different industries to avert a deeper recession.

This bailout will hurt the poor and middle class most as they see prices they pay for gas, food, and clothing rise until they are nearly double what they were last year. This will not happen right away, but Economics tells us when the money supply doubles, prices will double.

Unfortunately for Hawaii, only Neil Abercrombie has signed up to be a co-sponsor of H.R. 1207, please contact Mazie Hirono and ask her to support H.R. 1207. If Mazie Hirono can’t protect Hawaiians, perhaps we should replace her with someone that will.

Russell McGuire graduated from the University of Hawaii with a Bachelor’s in Economics and is the current contact for the Hawaii Republican Liberty Caucus. Be sure to send your H.R. 1207 op-eds to the the Honolulu Adverstiser, Honolulu Star Bulletin, MidWeek, Hawaii Tribune Herald, Honolulu Weekly and  Hawaii Reporter.

By Jon Yamasato

This month’s Oahu Real Estate Report covers sales and median price numbers for April 2009, and also features how interest rates affect your buying power.

Over the past three-month rolling period, February to April 2009, sales numbers were down compared to the same period in 2008. Oahu median prices have also declined compared to the same rolling 3-month period last year. Median prices for single-family homes dropped 7.1% to $585,000 and Condominiums have dropped 6.2% to $305,000. Prudential’s Oahu Real Estate Report looks at both monthly numbers as well as a rolling 3-month period as it provides better indicators of certain trends that are happening in the market.

Median price performance varies based on the different areas and neighborhoods across Oahu. For Condominiums, there are a few areas that continue an upward momentum in price. These areas include Downtown-Nuuanu, Ewa, Kaneohe, and Salt lake.  In addition to the 30 areas highlighted on the report, Prudential Locations tracks real estate data for over 200 unique neighborhoods across Oahu, many of which have their own unique trends. We encourage you to research neighborhoods that you are interested in.

Kauai’s, “Ron Paul Hawaii Walker” and  “Ron Paul Rider” turned “Liberty Rider”, Michael Maresco on Fox’s Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Related:

http://www.hawaiilibertychronicles.com/?p=630

What is a political party? Are there any differences between political parties?  What purposes do political parties serve?  Is a two party system all we have?  This month’s Li Zhao’s Intellectual Salon, Idea Exchange topic is “Party Schisms”.

Ken Schoolland will moderate this forum with Q&A to follow with Arvid Youngquist a Hawaii Democrat, Dan Douglass a Hawaii Republican and Larry Bartley a Hawaii Libertarian.

Please bring a friend and your favorite drink.

Pupus will be served. $5 donation per person.

Phone:
8086760825
Email:
Date:
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Time:
6:00pm - 8:00pm
Location:
The Schoolland’s
Street:
94-1072 Alelo St.
City/Town:
Waipahu, HI

Powerful, free website empowers citizens to track activity of state legislature and individual lawmakers

March 24, 2009 — Citizens now have a powerful, online tool to track the actions of Hawaii’s state legislature and individual legislators. HawaiiVotes.org is a free website that provides concise, non-partisan, plain-English descriptions of every bill, amendment and vote in the Hawaii House and Senate. These are all sortable by legislator, issue category, keyword and more, allowing a citizen to quickly create a custom “voting record guide” for any legislator on any issue.

How did a state representative or senator vote on an issue or bill that you care about? What bills and amendments did each legislator sponsor? What legislation actually became law this year – and what did not? What would all these bills actually do (vs. what their sponsors intend)? Which legislators have missed the most votes, and how many did yours miss? The answers to all those questions and more are at citizens’ fingertips 24 hours a day on HawaiiVotes.org.

HawaiiVotes.org is a free public service from the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii (GRIH), a nonpartisan, nonprofit research and educational institution. The purpose of the new site is to inform citizens, media and public officials about legislation that affects their families, schools, jobs and communities.

Grassroot Institute President Jamie Story says it’s a great tool for anyone who is either frustrated with the performance of elected officials or is just plain curious about the process. “The new website empowers citizens to actually participate in the democratic process,” she said. “HawaiiVotes.org will shed great light on our state legislature and government.”

The site also provides other features, including a comments section/forum where citizens can share their views about particular bills or other state public policy issues. A blog aggregator displays the most recent post of the state’s leading political blogs both left and right, and “LegislatorPedia” and “JudgePedia” shed additional sunlight on the Aloha state’s elected officials and judiciary.

“State government is involved in so many areas of our lives and economy; HawaiiVotes.org has never been needed more,” said GRIH Communications Director Tom McAuliffe. “It’s free, easy to use, fast and informative. Think of it as a giant spyglass on the Hawaii State Legislature!”

For more information please visit www.Hawaiivotes.org and www.grassrootinstitute.org

“Mom, there’s nothing good on TV!” “How come we never go out?” “Why can’t we ever find a good movie to go see?” If your family has been saying things like this, the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii has the answer with its new Family Brain Gain Seminars. Each month we show a liberty and free market-related video and then discuss it over refreshments.

Last month the videos of ABC News correspondent John Stossel were well received, as were special guests HPU Professor Ken Schoolland and his wife Li Zhao, who shared her incredible experience of living under Communist rule and during the Cultural Revolution in China. Mahalo nui loa to Ken and Li!

Please join us this month for The Singing Revolution, an award winning documentary film that tells the extraordinary story of the non-violent path Estonia took to free itself from Soviet occupation. A very moving film you won’t want to miss!

Thursday, March 19, 2009

6:45 — 8:45 PM (Please note the early start time!)

Trinity Presbyterian Church and School

875 Auloa Rd Kailua, Hawaii 96734

Dick Rowland, GRIH Founder and Youth Program Director, will be the moderator. You are welcome to invite friends and family. Please RSVP as soon as possible since space is limited. For reservations please email Lora Burbage at LLburbage@yahoo.com. If you have any questions you can also call Lora at 772-0787 or Dick at 864-1776. Donations to help defer expenses will be gratefully accepted.

Mahalo nui loa to Trinity Presbyterian Church and School for their support! For more information please visit: www.grassrootinstitute.org

By Russell Pang

HONOLULU – Governor Linda Lingle today submitted to the State Legislature the Administration’s plan to meet a projected $650 million revenue shortfall for the remainder of the current fiscal year (FY09) and biennium budget fiscal years 2010 through 2011.

The Administration’s plan balances the budget without raising taxes, without any layoffs or furloughs of state employees, and without making significant cuts to essential public services or programs.  It combines the use of federal stimulus funds, tobacco funds, interest from and charges to various special funds, adjustments to selected benefits for state employees, and further tightening Act 221 tax credits.

“While we are working to take maximum advantage of the federal funds available through the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, the additional federal funds alone will not be sufficient to close the projected revenue shortfall,” said Governor Lingle.

“In developing this balanced budget plan, our top priorities were to ensure we do not take any more taxpayer money out of the economy to support government, that we not add to the state’s unemployment by laying off employees, that we preserve essential public services, and that we continue to invest available resources in projects that will create jobs in the near term and achieve our long-term priorities such as energy independence.  This budget accomplishes those goals,” the Governor added.

In December, Governor Lingle submitted her Administration’s FY10-FY11 biennium budget which included a detailed plan to make up for a $1.1 billion revenue shortfall projected by the Council on Revenues.  On January 9, 2009, the Council lowered its revenue projections further by an additional $650 million for FY09, FY10 and FY11.

The Governor subsequently submitted an $81 million plan to close the FY09 shortfall through a combination of transferring funds from various special funds, including the rainy day fund, implementing additional restrictions on discretionary spending and utilizing additional federal reimbursements for Medicaid.

“Over the past year, we have made difficult but necessary decisions to reduce spending to ensure the state lives within its means,” the Governor said.  “At the same time, unprecedented national and global fiscal and economic challenges continue to impact our local economy and these realities mandate that we cannot continue to operate in a business-as-usual manner.

“We also must resist the impulse to raise taxes and fees because Hawai‘i’s families and small businesses are facing unprecedented challenges. We must ensure they keep as much of their money as possible.”

The Governor pointed out that additional budget adjustments will likely be needed when the Council on Revenues meets again on March 12, because it is anticipated that the Council will revise its revenue forecasts downward.

In addition to the plan to close the FY09 shortfall, the Administration is proposing the following nine action items to provide the state with additional general fund revenues needed to close the revenue shortfall:

  • Utilize federal stimulus Medicaid funds. Nearly half of the shortfall will be covered by an estimated $320 million in Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) funds. The matching federal funds for treating Medicaid patients are part of the $15 billion in Medicaid assistance being made available to the states under the recently passed federal stimulus plan. Hawai‘i is scheduled to receive $106.7 million for FY09, $142.2. million in FY10 and $71.1 million in FY11.  As of last week, states were allowed to start accessing FMAP funds (Impact: $320 million, FY09-FY11.)
  • Redistribute a portion of the Tobacco Settlement Funds. The Administration supports a bill (HB1731) currently before the Legislature to reallocate the distribution of the Tobacco Settlement Special Fund, including depositing 14 percent into the state’s general fund.  This action would add $7 million per year to the state’s revenues.  (Impact: $14 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Transfer tobacco tax revenues to the general fund. The Administration supports a bill (HB1732) currently before the Legislature which would allow the use of tobacco tax revenues. The redistribution of the tobacco tax is expected to add $33 million to the state’s general fund in the upcoming biennium. (Impact: $33 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Advance the general excise tax filing date. The Administration supports a bill (HB1735) currently before the Legislature to change the filing date for the general excise monthly tax return from the last day of the calendar month following the month in which taxes accrue to the 20th day of that month.  The earlier collection of taxes within the fiscal year will generate a one-time revenue gain of $40 million in FY11.  (Impact:  $40 million, FY11.)
  • Remove the exemption for certain special funds from assessments. The Administration proposes removing a provision that currently exempts certain special funds from paying their fair share of assessments to support central services and departmental administrative expenses.  A bill (HB1740) currently before the Legislature would remove the exemption for all but a handful of special funds, including the Hawai‘i Hurricane Relief Fund, Convention Center Enterprise Special Fund and Tourism Special Fund.  The Administration supports this measure, but proposes also allowing the following special funds to retain the exemption from assessments:  State Educational Facilities Improvement Special Fund, Hawai‘i Health Systems Corporation Special Fund and University of Hawai‘i Special Fund.  This action would result in an additional $9.8 million annually. (Impact: $19.6 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Transfer interest earned on certain special funds to the general fund. The Administration supports a measure (HB1733) before the Legislature to allow the transfer of interest earned on investments of special funds, revolving funds and special accounts into the general fund.  This action would not impact the amount in these funds that are generated through user fees or charges.  The use of the interest earnings would result in an estimated $38.2 million in general fund revenues. (Impact: $38.2 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Discontinue employer-funded group life insurance. The Administration supports a bill (HB1726) currently before the Legislature to prevent the Hawai‘i Employer-Union Health Benefit Trust Fund (EUTF) from providing group life insurance benefits if the premiums are paid for by the state or a county.  Currently, the employer (the state or a county) pays the entire premium for the life insurance benefit.  Premiums are more expensive than paying death benefits directly to survivors.  Discontinuing this practice would save the state $4.1 million in FY10 and $4.3 million in FY11.  (Impact: $8.4 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Seek adjustments to the EUTF health benefits plan. The Administration will seek adjustments to the current Employer-Union Health Benefit Trust Fund health plan through collective bargaining negotiations. If the current health benefits plan is sustained, with the state covering 60 percent of the cost, the premiums will increase by an estimated 29.4 percent.  This proposal would not affect retirees and their dependent beneficiaries. This effort would provide a cost savings of approximately $48 million per year.  (Impact: $96 million, FY10-FY11.)
  • Further tighten Act 221 to reduce tax credits to investors in technology businesses. Rather than allowing investors to get back a full dollar for each dollar they invest, investors will receive 50 cents for each dollar invested, sharing their risk with state taxpayers.  This effort will save an estimated $43.9 in the biennium. (Impact: $43.9 million, FY10-FY11.)

In addition to closing the revenue shortfall over the next two years, the Administration is also focused on ensuring long-term fiscal stability for the state.  The Administration supports a bill (HB1715) currently before the Legislature to increase by five years the minimum retirement age and minimum length of service before a state employee can receive full service retirement benefits.  The measure would only apply to employees who enter public service on or after July 1, 2009.  The annual savings for this proposal starting in FY2013 is approximately $39 million.

The U.S. Supreme Court released the full transcript from this morning’s hearing.

http://www.inversecondemnation.com/files/07-1372.pdf

Two Hawaii State Capitol insider blogs, The Notebook and Poinography have generated the most activity on the subject of the Civil Union (HB444) legislation over the past several days with state and even city officials weighing in both in pseudonym and in name.  Proponents and now opponents near and far have there eyes on this bill.

Testimony in the House last week was dominated by proponents of HB 444.  It is now in Senate Judiciary committee with it’s members receiving a wave of emails and calls after opponents of HB 444 began organizing efforts this past weekend.

Former LIUNA union representative, Jimmy Kuroiwa, estimated around fifty church and faith community leaders attended the meeting called by Hawaii Family Forum within 24 hour notice.  Former state Representative Dennis Arakaki is the current head of Hawaii Family Forum.  A rally at the Capitol has been scheduled by the group for this Sunday, February 22 at 2p.  Thousands are expected to attend.

Quotable Kamehameha III

by admin | February 18, 2009 | In Quotable No Comments

Ua mau ke ea o ka ʻāina i ka pono. (The life of the land is perpetuated in righteousness.)

~ Kamehameha III, amid the uncertainty of surrendering the Hawaiian kingdom to the British crown (1843).

.

Part I covered the history and purpose of the Jones Act.

Part II covered proponents arguments and analysis.

For the full study with all figures and tables, log on to Jones Act study 2009.

By Daniel Brackins

Job Protectionism and Unemployment

As has been noted the U.S. shipping industry attempts to increases the wages of its employers with the use of the Jones Act. This is primarily accomplished through unions. A binding minimum wage can be introduced either by law or through collective bargaining.

The point of intersection of the supply and demand curves is the equilibrium point where supply equals demand. This point changes with shifts in the demand for labor (increase in demand for labor will increase price of labor).  If labor markets were free to operate with no outside influence, then supply would equal demand, and all those who desired employment would be employed.

We see that if the wage rate is higher than the equilibrium wage rate, the supply of labor will exceed the demand. By creating an artificial price floor for labor that is above the equilibrium wage rate, the supply of labor will exceed the demand (at that wage rate) and not all people who seek employment will be able to find a job. Note that if the wage is set below the equilibrium wage, it will have no effect on the equilibrium point for the labor market (a nonbinding constraint). The higher the minimum wage above the equilibrium wage, the greater is the impact. The magnitude of the impact is also determined by the number of people who are currently being paid the minimum wage, and therefore directly affected by the change. Bargaining power obtained through the representation of large numbers of workers can result in wage rates that are well above the equilibrium rate. Often studies allude to cases where there appears to be little or no negative effects resulting from a minimum wage increase. These conclusions may occur due to the magnitude, timing, and number of employees impacted by the increase.

There is an inability for unions to create wage equality through artificial wage inflation. In the unions’ attempt to equalize wages they have essentially done the opposite. An artificial increase in wages above the real market value assumes an infinite amount of monetary supply (Gallaway & Vetter, n.d.). With this failed logic it would be acceptable to pay a floor sweeper $50 per hour or perhaps $500 per hour. Yet the money supply is not unlimited; therefore, any shift will create a side effect. As a result any money given to one person must be taken from another. In the case of wage inequality it is wages that would have been given to another had the wages been

In the industry represented in the diagram there are a total of 5,000 jobs possible before saturation occurs.The market rate has established $10 per hour for this job and would allow for maximization and full employment. However, if an artificial rate were established at $50 per hour, as a result, only 1,000 workers could be utilized. This would prevent 4,000 workers from entering the industry.

Decline of U.S. Shipping

In comparison to other nations without cabotage restrictions there has been a decline in the U.S. shipping fleet, losing out to the competition of these other nations (Competition, 2006).  This is occurring despite the protectionist policies of the United States.  A comparison of vessels operating can be seen in figures 3 and 4.

It must be noted that the protectionist policies of the U.S. has reduced the number of U.S. flagged ships in operation.  On the other hand countries that exercise free trade policies, without cabotage laws, such as Panama, Singapore, and Hong Kong have a flourishing merchant fleet.  Open competition has created incentives for companies to operate in these nations.  Even U.S. shipping companies are aware of this benefit.  Despite having to pay a 36% penalty fee under Jones Act laws, Matson has some of its ships repaired in Shanghai, China.  Matson spokeman Jeff Hull stated, “[despite the fee] it’s still considerably cheaper” (Little, 2001).

References

1800JonesAct. (2008). The Jones Act U.S.C. Title 46 (Recodified 2006). Retrieved November 21, 2008 from http://www.1800jonesact.com/maritime_statutes/default.asp

Competition in the Noncontiguous Domestic Maritime Trades (2006).  U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration.

Little, R. (2001). U.S. merchant fleets sails toward oblivion.  The Baltimore Sun.  Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.mcall.com/topic/balte.bz.
sealift06aug06,0,7707946.story?page=1

Longshormen, Making $100K Per Year, Won’t Reduce Demands (2002). Rense.com. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://www.rense.com/general30/long.htm

Maritime Flags of Convenience Visualized (2007). gCaptain. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/tag/data/

McClintock, M. (2004). Merchant Marine Act of 1920. eNotes.com. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/merchant-marine-act

Official USDA Alaska and Hawaii Thrifty Food Plans: Cost of Food at Home (2008).  United States Department of Agriculture.

Official USDA Food Plans: Cost of Food at Home at Four Levels (2008).  United States Department of Agriculture.

The Economic Effects of Significant U.S. Import Restrains Fifth Update 2007 Investigation No. 332-325 (2007).  United States International Trade Commission.

The Hidden Costs of U.S. Shipping Laws (1996).  Public Interest Institute.

The Price of Paradise! (n.d.). Alternative-Hawaii. Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.alternative-hawaii.com/overpop.htm

The World Factbook (2008).  Central Intelligence Agency.  Retrieved October 2, 2008 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

The civil unions for same-sex couples battle in our State Capitol just turned up a notch this weekend.  A new website, http://protectourkeiki.com/ has targeted Waipahu/Pearl City/Crestview Senator Clarence Nishihara as “RUINING HAWAII” and “WANTS YOUR KEIKI TO BELIEVE THAT SAME SEX MARRIAGE IS OK.”

As reported in the Honolulu Advertiser, Nishihara supports HB444.

If a firestorm of opposition now erupts because of this bill as this issue erupted in ‘98, how will it effect gubernatorial and lt. gubernatorial hopefuls Hanabusa, Hooser and Bunda in the Senate?  What about House members looking at their options?

It was in ‘98 that then Senator Rey Graulty was defeated by Senator Norman Sakamoto in the Democratic primary.   Graulty was a proponet of same-sex marriage while Sakamoto, a socially conservative Democrat, campaigned strategically on the same-sex marriage issue.  Mailouts went to every voting househould with pictures of two wedding cakes.  One cake with two men on it saying Graulty supports same-sex marriage and the other cake with a man and a woman on it saying Sakamoto supports traditional marriage.

The focus of the traditional marriage proponents message in ‘98 emphasized that same-sex marriage would be taught to children as equal to opposite-sex marriage.  This is similar to messaging now used on the new site targeting Nishihara.  Whoever the mind or minds behind the “Protect Our Keiki” site are, they (and ambitious politicians) should soon see how effective their messaging is 11 years later.

By David A. Singhiser

Dear Senator,

I have no illusion and will not be surprised when you vote for the new scam President Obama is pushing on us. He is using fear to further increase the power and scope of the Federal Government (as Mr. Emmanuel said, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.”)

Nevertheless, I want you to know that I am against the bailouts.

Can you explain to me the moral and constitutional justification for doing this?

Can you explain where the money will come from?

There are only three sources: inflate the currency, borrow the money, or increase taxes.

Can you explain how it is moral to inflate the currency, thus taxing the poorest of our citizens and robbing the people of their savings?

Can you explain how is it moral to borrow more money, thus putting our children, our grandchildren, and us further in debt?

Can you explain how is it moral to increase the tax burden on a nation that is already suffering, robbing the people of what little the government already allows them to keep in order to bailout incompetent corporations?

You swore to uphold and defend the Constitution.

How is this bailout constitutional? It is not. It is immoral and unconstitutional.

Let’s be honest, shall we?

We are no longer a constitutional republic under the rule of law; we are a democracy under the rule of the mob. The Constitution is dead. Every vote for a bailout, every unconstitutional act of Congress, the President, and Judiciary shows the contempt the three branches have for the Constitution, making a mockery of it and your oath of office to uphold it.

David A. Singhiser is a Honolulu resident.

Hawaii is mentioned as one of 20 states where lawmakers have moved to reclaim sovereignty in this worldnetdaily.com.  Jerome Corsi lumps Hawaii’s sovereignty movement in with more recent movements reacting to the new $1trillion Obama stimulus package.

.

Part I addressed the history and purpose of the Jones Act in this series.

By Daniel Brackins

Proponent Argument

In addition to national defense, proponents argue that the Jones Act provides additional benefits to the United States.  Among these include job protection due to unfair competition by from other nations.

Job Protection

Phillip Grill (1996) says that job protected by the Jones Act is 124,000 (as cited in The Hidden Costs, 1996).  Grill further says that these jobs must be protected in order to prevent the loss of jobs to foreign competitors, who charge less than fair wages for similar work done by U.S. workers.  This is a claim to unfair competition.  Indeed the wages of a merchant marine are incredibly high compared to their counterparts.  A U.S. longshoreman or marine clerk can earn upwards of $100,000 to $137,000 per year (Longshoremen, 2002).  Indeed this is a much greater salary found in such places as China.  This increased cost of wages will be further analyzed.

National Defense

In the wars of this century, commercial shipping has been critically important. The relevant question is not whether future threats might require that fleets of commercial-type ships be available. The question is whether present programs provide such a capability effectively and efficiently.  If the U.S. flagged fleet is fully employed during peacetime serving commercially important domestic and international trades, it is neither an entirely reliable nor a low-cost military reserve. This was verified during the Gulf War (Ferguson, n.d.).

Some security justification for transporting war material in peacetime exclusively on U.S. flagged ships is valid. The fact that a large fraction of military preference cargo consists of household goods and private automobiles dilutes any such basis for incurring the high costs of cargo preferences. Further, cargo preference does not buy much reserve military capability; the cargo preference largely supports bulk carriers and container ships that are of limited military use (Ferguson, n.d.).

The higher than competitive prices that are permitted under the antitrust exemption for conference ratemaking may be important, given present regulatory constraints, in sustaining the U.S. flag fleet. However, more than 80 percent of traffic in American international liner commerce is carried by foreign companies. Therefore, whatever military gain is achieved through conference price fixing accrues predominantly to foreign governments (Ferguson, n.d.).

The defense-related rationale for present policies presupposes that, despite the enormous capacity available on the open market, only U.S.-flag service could be relied on in an emergency. In contrast, the Military SealiftCommand made extensive use of foreign ships and crews in the Gulf War, and representatives of the Department of Defense have recently declared that there is no need to rely on the U.S.-flag commercial fleet in any foreseeable wars (Ferguson, n.d.).

Analysis

Operating Cost Differentials

Vessel costs are primarily comprised of capital and operating costs. Capital costs refer to vessel construction costs.  Operating costs include wages paid to crews, direct fuel charges, insurance, maintenance and repair, and other administrative expenses. Of these, labor and maintenance costs are typically higher in absolute terms for U.S. vessels than for foreign-flagged vessels (table 1). U.S. crew costs generally account for most of the differences in operating costs between U.S. and foreign flagged vessels. For example, manning costs account for 77 percent of the operating cost differential for a typical oil tanker and 81 percent of the cost differential for a typical containership (The Economic Effects, 2007).

Table 1.

Expense Category

U.S. Flagged

Foreign Flagged

Crew

12,705

2,940

Fuel

4,410

3,045

Maint. & Repair

2,310

1,470

Insurance

13,335

13,335

Other

1,500

1,400

TOTAL

$34,260

$22,190

Source:  The Economic Effects, 2007

The above table indicates a large crew expense for U.S. flagged ships.  In addition to the higher salaries demanded, American ships must hire more crew members than foreign ships, often 23 or more, compared with as few as 11 on other vessels (Little, 2001).  Even ship owners willing to pay American salaries say they were forced from the fleet because of all the other expenses that the U.S. flag requires. “Foreign crews eat less, they travel economy class, they seem to use less [provisions], there’s less overtime, no workers complaints,” said Vass, who re-flagged the LNG Aquarius. “I can’t think of anything that didn’t cost more. Like the beef. They would only eat prime American beef - not choice, like your wife feeds you, but prime, U.S. beef. We had to fly it out to Japan.”I’m not saying the Americans aren’t good. They are. But the foreign crew doesn’t mind eating Australian beef” (Little, 2001). In the past 25 years 1,600 vessels have left the U.S. fleet (Little, 2001).

In Hawaii many cattle ranchers have decided to use airplanes to ship their cattle.  They find it cheaper and more efficient than shipping them on U.S. flagged ships.  These cattle fly on 747s in livestock containers at 30 cents a pound (Little, 2001).  They have no other choice since foreign flagged vessels are not allowed to ship cargo from one U.S. port to another.

If foreign vessels were allowed to participate in U.S. cabotage, some industry analysts maintain that, in addition to complying with environmental laws, foreign vessels operating in U.S. domestic waters would be required to comply with other U.S. regulations, including federal and state tax, immigration, and labor laws.  According to industry representatives, foreign vessel compliance with these laws likely would increase the costs of such vessels operating in Jones Act trade, thereby substantially decreasing the cost differential between U.S. and foreign flagged carriers.  However, only some of these laws would apply to foreign vessels if they were allowed to participate in Jones Act trade (The Economic Effects, 2007).

Job Protectionism and Unemployment

As has been noted the U.S. shipping industry attempts to increases the wages of its employers with the use of the Jones Act.  This is primarily accomplished through unions.

1800JonesAct. (2008). The Jones Act U.S.C. Title 46 (Recodified 2006). Retrieved November 21, 2008 from http://www.1800jonesact.com/maritime_statutes/default.asp

Competition in the Noncontiguous Domestic Maritime Trades (2006).  U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration.

Little, R. (2001). U.S. merchant fleets sails toward oblivion.  The Baltimore Sun.  Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.mcall.com/topic/balte.bz. sealift06aug06,0,7707946.story?page=1

Longshormen, Making $100K Per Year, Won’t Reduce Demands (2002). Rense.com. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://www.rense.com/general30/long.htm

Maritime Flags of Convenience Visualized (2007). gCaptain. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/tag/data/

McClintock, M. (2004). Merchant Marine Act of 1920. eNotes.com. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/merchant-marine-act

Official USDA Alaska and Hawaii Thrifty Food Plans: Cost of Food at Home (2008).  United States Department of Agriculture.

Official USDA Food Plans: Cost of Food at Home at Four Levels (2008).  United States Department of Agriculture.

The Economic Effects of Significant U.S. Import Restrains Fifth Update 2007 Investigation No. 332-325 (2007).  United States International Trade Commission.

The Hidden Costs of U.S. Shipping Laws (1996).  Public Interest Institute.

The Price of Paradise! (n.d.). Alternative-Hawaii. Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.alternative-hawaii.com/overpop.htm

The World Factbook (2008).  Central Intelligence Agency.  Retrieved October 2, 2008 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

By Grassroot Institute of Hawaii

Senate Bill 659

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/Bills/SB659_.pdf , a measure with the potential to greatly increase transparency and accountability in Hawaii state government, has been scheduled for hearing at 9:30 am on Thursday, February 5 in conference room 211 of the state Capitol. The bill, which is being heard by the Senate Ways and Means Committee, would create a publicly-accessible, online database for all state grants and awards over $25,000. You may remember that a similar bill was passed in the prior legislative session, but the Governor allowed the bill to go into effect without her signature, and the bill was never implemented.

SB 659 addresses concerns shared by the Governor and others.

Regardless of your feelings for or against the bill, we encourage you to submit written testimony no later than Wednesday evening, or even more importantly to provide oral testimony at the hearing on Thursday morning.

The meeting notice and instructions on giving testimony can be found here

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/hearingnotices/HEARING_WAM_02. Please check back regularly to confirm no changes have been made. If you decide to give testimony, we would appreciate it if you could let us know, so we can keep track of the impact GRIH and its supporters are having. If you have any further questions, please contact me the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii at 808-591-9193.

One final note—The companion bill of SB 659 is House Bill 1840, introduced by Representative Gene Ward and referred to the House Finance Committee.

We encourage you to contact members

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/site1/house/comm/commFIN.asp of the committee, in particular Chair Marcus Oshiro, to share your thoughts as to whether or not this bill should be given a hearing.

This is worth re-posting from Lewrockwell.com in light of “Civil Unions”  being a hot issue this session at our Hawaii State Capitol.

By David Kramer

“In the U.K., grandparents were forced to give up their grandchildren by social services because they were considered too old. They are 59 and 46, respectively. The grandchildren were later given up for adoption to a gay couple.

I guess unlike the United States, the U.K. doesn’t have “progressive” age discrimination laws.”

Here’s an excerpt from the telegraph.co.uk article referred to:

The distraught grandfather said: “It breaks my heart to think that our grandchildren are being forced to grow up in an environment without a mother-figure.

“We are not prejudiced, but I defy anyone to explain to us how this can be in their best interests.

“The ideal for any child is to have a loving father and a loving mother in their lives.”

His wife added: “It’s so important for children to fit in, and I feel our grandchildren will be marked out from the start when they draw pictures of their two dads.”

The case raises fears about state interference in family arrangements, and concerns about the practice of adoption by same-sex couples.

Editor’s note:  Hawaii Liberty Chronicles contributor, Daniel Brackins, has released his research on the Jones Act’s economic impact on Hawaii written on assignment for his 6000 level Economics course at Hawaii Pacific University.  It will be released in parts with this first portion covering the history and purpose of the Jones Act.  Pictures added at editors discretion.

The Merchant Marine Act of 1920, commonly referred to as the Jones Act, is a United States Federal statute that regulates maritime commerce in U.S. waters and between U.S. ports.  It is a cabotage law which also contains provisions regarding seamen’s rights.  These cabotage provisions restrict the carriage of goods or passengers between U.S. ports to U.S. manufactured flagged vessels.  In addition, it maintains that 75% of the crew members must be U.S. citizens.  Also repair work of U.S. flagged vessels’ hulls and superstructures is limited to 10% of foreign built steel weight (1800JonesAct, 2008).  These restrictions are largely American protectionist policies.  These policies have a significant impact on the economy of the United States.  Since Hawaii is an island which relies on trade and commerce for subsistence, the Jones Act has severe negative implications for the economy of Hawaii.

No reliable analyses of the economic benefits of U.S. maritime polices have been published.  Nor has there been a reliable study as to the benefits of a repeal of the Jones Act.  As a result, judgment of these policies must be made by their rationale and their specific impact on certain economic sectors. Unfortunately there is even less information available for the economic impacts on the State of Hawaii.  This paper will focus on the implications for the economy of Hawaii.  It will demonstrate that costs for moving cargo between U.S. ports is far higher than if such restrictions did not apply, and that this cost is passed on to the consumer.  It will also show that the U.S. shipbuilding industry has also suffered as a result of the Jones Act, and this it has prevented U.S. flagged ships from competing in international shipping.  In addition a focus will be on the final implications for Hawaii’s consumers who bear the burden of this failed economic policy.  Ultimately it will be shown what steps can be taken to reverse the negative impacts of the Jones Act and make Hawaii a prosperous state.  Conclusions will be drawn from the general impact of the cabotage law on the United States and its effects on Hawaii.

The Hawaiian Merchant leaves San Francisco Bay on Aug. 31, 1958, with 20 24-foot containers on its deck. The Matson ship inaugurated container shipping in the Pacific. Photo: Matson Navigation Co.

The Hawaiian Merchant leaves San Francisco Bay on Aug. 31, 1958, with 20 24-foot containers on its deck. The Matson ship inaugurated container shipping in the Pacific. Photo: Matson Navigation Co.

History and Purpose of the Jones Act

The intent and purpose of the Jones Act has been codified in the preamble of the Act itself:

  • It is necessary for the national defense and for the proper growth of its foreign and domestic commerce that the United States shall have a merchant marine of the best equipped and most suitable types of vessels sufficient to carry the greater portion of its commerce and serve as a naval or military auxiliary in time of war or national emergency, ultimately to be owned and operated privately by citizens of the United States; and it is declared to be the policy of the United States to do whatever may be necessary to develop and encourage the maintenance of such a merchant marine…(1800JonesAct, 2008)

The history of the Jones Act must be evaluated in its historical context.  At the turn of the century the United States was completing a process of development after overcoming the turmoil of the Civil War.  It was at this time that strong and viable merchant fleet became a political priority.  The British, known for a strong merchant fleet, were looked upon as a model because of their ascension to a position of dominant world power.  This was attributed to having a strong naval fleet.  Sir Walter Raleigh stated, “Whosoever commands the sea commands trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself” (McClintock, 2004).

Destroyers present include: USS Farquhar (DD-304), at left; USS Reno (DD-303), center; USS William Jones (DD-308), right center; and USS Hull (DD-330). Photographed by the Shura Studio, Honolulu. Courtesy of Charles Sass, 1979. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

Another development was the need for American military forces to have a dependable sea lift capability in time of defense.  This was realized during World War I.  The infant U.S. Navy did not possess the capability of performing this function, and thus relied on the civilian sector for the transport of military cargo to overseas destinations.

The volume of cargo and international trade for the U.S. merchant fleet had drastically decreased due to the economic decline and global turmoil caused by World War I.  Further complicating the ability of the U.S. merchant fleet to compete in international commerce were higher construction and operation costs. For example, in 1926 the comparative monthly crew costs for ships of equal size were: $3,270 for the United States; $1,308 for Great Britain; and $777 for Japan.  Historically, the United States curbed the impact of such issues through cabotage laws, which are government measures used to protect or foster a domestic shipping industry by reserving all or a portion of international sea commerce to ships which fly the national flag (McClintock, 2004).

Cabotage laws were first introduced with the Shipping Act of 1916. The Shipping Act stated that only citizens of the United States, or companies in which a controlling interest was held by a citizen of the United States, could own a U.S. vessel. Additionally, the secretary of transportation had strict control over the transfer and chartering of U.S. vessels to foreign companies, and it provided for the regulation of rate agreements to avoid rate wars.  Subsequently, Congress passed the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, which was arguably the nation’s most influential cabotage law (McClintock, 2004).

1800JonesAct. (2008). The Jones Act U.S.C. Title 46 (Recodified 2006). Retrieved November 21, 2008 from http://www.1800jonesact.com/maritime_statutes/default.asp

McClintock, M. (2004). Merchant Marine Act of 1920. eNotes.com. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/merchant-marine-act

NEWS RELEASE
THE GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII

2009 Hawaii Pork Report
Grassroot Institute and CAGW Expose Waste in Hawaii Government

Jan. 28, 2009 — Hawaii taxpayers recently paid almost $3,000 for a state employee to travel to Los Angeles for the Grammy Music Awards, according to a new report from The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii (GRIH) and premiere taxpayer watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW). In the midst of a significant state budget shortfall, the 2009 Hawaii Pork Report reveals that bureaucrats continue to spend taxpayer dollars in questionable ways. The exposé, which is the first of its kind in the state, reveals egregious waste, abuse and mismanagement of taxpayer dollars—and gives concrete examples of overspending to policymakers looking to trim fat from state and local budgets.

Some examples of frivolous spending that are sure to raise the ire of hard-working citizens include:

·       $2,829.91 for a state employee to travel to California for the Grammy Awards;

·       $875,000 to reconstruct a hiking trail that is now barred from public access at a cost of an additional $50,000 a year;

·       $130,000 to an artist for ceramic tiles adorning water coolers at the Hawaii Convention Center; and

·       $2,400,000 for substitute custodians in public schools.

Pearl Hahn, GRIH policy analyst and lead author of the report, remarked, “The only thing more shocking than the sheer amount of waste is the degree to which government officials will go to hide that waste. This report gives dozens of examples of abuse of taxpayer dollars—but there are hundreds, if not thousands, more examples waiting to be found.”

“The 2009 Hawaii Pork Report is the first step in bringing fiscal sanity to the Aloha State,” said David Williams, Vice-President for Policy at CAGW in Washington, D.C. “With an economic downturn it’s important for government to get rid of unnecessary and ridiculous programs and evaluate those essential programs making government more efficient. Before taxpayers are asked for one more dime of their hard earned money, state and local governments need to rebuild the trust they’ve lost,” he said. “Establishing a website with state and local government expenditures and creating a state Grace Commission to go through every nook and cranny in the budget would help fix that broken trust.”

The 2009 Hawaii Pork Report can be found at the GRIH website: www.grassrootinstitute.org. The mission of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is to promote individual liberty, free market economic principles and limited, more accountable government.

Finer Points Must Be Addressed for Hawaii’s Future Freedom

By Daniel Brackins and Dan Douglass

On Monday Governor Lingle issued her State of the State address. Politically she came across well and sensible. To her credit she connected with the public much more-so than last April when her address to the Hawaii Economic Association sparked our initial Economic Reality Check for Governor Lingle. Some things we agree with and others we don’t. Finer points must be addressed.

In her speech there were a few surprises. She called for energy independence (not a surprise) and food self-sufficiency (surprise). This is an admirable goal since the premium cost of food is an unnecessary burden for Hawaii’s people. Yet she failed to mention that Hawaii’s high cost of food is caused by two primary factors: the shipping monopoly (resulting from no Hawaii exemption from the Jones Act) and food tax. Food is an item that the consumer has no choice but to buy. Food is a necessity for life, and yet the state taxes this. The Governor must concert efforts, based on the understanding that under our current economic conditions many could use the additional 4% in their pockets.

Urging various state departments to buy local produce seems a well start, but skirts the basic problem of how the once booming agricultural industry has been incrementally destroyed in our state by the shipping monopoly. The consequence of state departments paying premium costs for local goods will increase the cost of the various departments (unless the departments are downsized) that ultimately all the taxpayers of Hawaii pay for.

The basic flaw is common in the bureaucratic mindset from county to federal. It is the false assumption that consumption/consumerism is the answer; this mantra of economic stimulus through liquidity. But where does the flow come from? It’s taken from the productive sector that generates voluntarily growing stimulus (through the free exchange of goods and services) that must be left alone as much as possible. To punish the productive sector by urging consumption on the state departmental level is utter nonsense that in effect continues to “kick the can down the road” for the longer term.

Lingle also called for a reduction in government services and pay cuts for government employees (surprise). We agree that this is a necessary step. There is a huge amount of overlap and duplication of government services. We recommend that the governor create a special task force (at no taxpayer cost) to eliminate overlap, improve efficiency, and reduce waste. We feel that this alone would eliminate the state’s projected $1.8 billion deficit.

Ultimately lasting wealth will come from entrepreneurial determination. This is something creative that almost always dies once government’s sticky fingers or iron fists get in on the action. Thus it takes courageous leadership to outsource, streamline and sunset governing agencies out of the productive sector’s way as much as possible.

Thus we stand firmly opposed to the Governor’s proposal to delay, curtail, or eliminate tax credits, exemptions or deductions. Tax cuts will allow the additional money in the consumers’ and investors’ pockets to help stimulate the economy through additional purchasing power. Moreover every proposal for tax reform should be evaluated apart from the typically exaggerated claims. How to think about any given tax reform? Here are four rules:

  • 1) If a bill reduces taxes through lower rates or increased deductions, it should be supported;
  • 2) If a bill increases taxes through raising rates or repealing deductions, it should be opposed;
  • 3) If a bill includes tax increases as well as tax reductions, it’s intellectually incoherent and therefore probably a trick;
  • 4) If a bill promises to reduce taxes and increase revenue, it should be rejected out of hand.

While we agree that a deferral of the transit tax on Oahu should be an option, it does not go far enough. The transit tax should be eliminated for similar reason stated above. Transit tax collections have already dropped by 16% since last year, a total of $2.6 million. This is in opposition to what the planners had anticipated when they claimed revenue would continue to rise each year. This makes funding the rail system without raising taxes unrealistic. We believe that the whole rail project itself should be scrapped. In the current state of economic crisis on all bureaucratic levels, Hawaii productive taxpayer base (the real golden goose) cannot finance the Honolulu Rail Cartel’s monstrosity.

Once again we must reiterate that she reconsider her own five-point economic plan. Our own plan to stimulate Hawaii’s economy would include the following:

  • Offer large tax incentives to business- this would include eliminating the corporate income tax or, at the very least, largely reducing it. This would include all industries, leaving none out. Incentives for small business development must also be explored.
  • Lowering the tax burden- a reduction of taxes across the board including the GE tax. Taxes magnify the cost of doing business in Hawaii.
  • Personalization of services- by eliminating wasteful state run services, such as the Department of Human Services (as an example), and outsourcing to non-profits, government spending can be largely reduced. This will also help with the previous point of tax reduction.
  • State exemption from the Jones Act- this would effectively terminate the shipping monopoly and lower the cost of goods substantially.
  • Free trade zones- by allowing tax free, tariff free, and duty free goods to be exchanged in Hawaii, the state could become a trading hub in the center of the Pacific connecting many areas of the world.
  • Marketing to outside business- with large incentives for business, the state should market on the mainland and in other countries in order to bring business to Hawaii.

Both Hawaii Republican and Democratic Party politicians must shun the temptation of enriching friends, families and allies at the expense of the families and businesses on the brink of moving to economically freer states or nations. Our Hawaii’s future freedom demands these bold measures from all our leadership that generates incentive for success and eliminates corruption.

Governor Linda Lingle’s 2009 State of the State Address

Senate President Hanabusa, Speaker Say, Lt. Governor and Mrs. Aiona, former Governor Ariyoshi, former Governor Waihe‘e and Mrs. Waihe‘e, members of the Legislature, cabinet members, Chief Justice Moon, Chair Apoliona, Mayor Tavares, Mayor Kenoi, military leaders, members of the Consular Corps, distinguished guests, and to the people of Hawai‘i…good morning and aloha!

It is a great privilege and a humbling experience to come before you each year to share my thoughts about where our state stands, and where we are headed.

The annual State of the State Address is a time-honored tradition in states all across our great nation.

It is a time to take stock of where we are as a state, to recognize a few successes, and to lay out a clear roadmap for our future.

In this sense, it is a fairly typical speech.

But this has not been a typical year. We are facing a time like no other in our state’s history.

And 2009 will be one of the most challenging years in our nation’s history as we confront one of the severest economic crises we have ever faced.

The daunting task we face in the months ahead is making some very difficult decisions in order to address our immediate fiscal problems.

These are not decisions that any of us want to make, but they are decisions that must be made.

They are the same kinds of decisions being made across our state by individuals, families, businesses and organizations as they too confront a near-term future with substantially fewer financial resources, and a high degree of uncertainty.

I’m an optimist by nature…and as Winston Churchill said, “An optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.”

So, I come before you today with a clear understanding of the enormity of what we face in the near term, but still enthusiastic about planning for our future together and optimistic about Hawai‘i in the 21st century.

Together we will meet both our near-term and long-term obligations by making those decisions necessary to navigate through the turbulence of the current fiscal crisis and achieve our preferred future.

That future includes energy independence, increased food self-sufficiency, and a 21st-century infrastructure that supports existing and emerging industries.

Our future also includes a well-cared for environment that increases recreational opportunities across the state.

We cannot afford to merely hunker down and muddle through the next year or two.

This is a time for us to work together to address the immediate reality, while searching for those opportunities that will enable us to emerge from this situation stronger than ever.

This dual effort will take patience and courage because there will be those who want to ignore reality and continue spending at current levels.

And others who only want to deal with our immediate revenue shortfall while deferring any talk of the future.

Either approach would leave us far short of meeting our duty to the people of Hawai‘i – a duty both to live within our means and position ourselves for a brighter future.

As we face this historic challenge, it is easy to forget how much success we have enjoyed in recent years.

I want to review the solid progress we have made in several areas, including home ownership and helping those most in need.

Since May of 2006 we have built nine new emergency shelters and transitional housing projects that provide safe and clean places to live for many who previously could only find a night’s rest in our parks, beaches, doorways or in their cars.

Nearly 2,800 people, including hundreds of children, have received not only safe shelter, but social services and an outpouring of community support to help them transition from homelessness to self-sufficiency.

It took many people to achieve so much in just two-and-a-half short years. I want to thank our entire community for embracing and helping those who had lost all hope.

In an attempt to address a completely different kind of housing need, we’re all aware of the success the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands has had.

They’ve awarded more land to their beneficiaries than at any time in the history of the trust, and we all enjoy seeing families who have waited for decades finally receiving their homesteads.

But there’s a much larger DHHL story that will be fully revealed in the years ahead.

It is the story of a native Hawaiian agency that has chosen to meet its fiduciary duty to its beneficiaries by leading in a way that benefits the larger community of Hawai‘i.

Whether it’s their pivotal role in the $110 million Kroc Center, development of the future DeBartolo regional mall, kick-starting the infrastructure UH West O‘ahu needed in order to move forward, or being the first state department to move its entire O‘ahu operation to the Second City of Kapolei, DHHL has chosen to lead.

We now look to them as an important and integral part of our economic recovery, and as an example of how to develop desirable communities.

They are even blazing their own trail in our state’s efforts to achieve energy independence and provide a clean energy future for the generations that will follow.

Few could have envisioned six years ago the heights to which DHHL and the Hawaiian Homes Commission would soar.

I believe their well-recognized success has been achieved partly because of how they contributed to the broader community.

DHHL is not just about building homes, it is about building great communities.

And they have succeeded because they have demanded more of themselves and their beneficiaries.

The bottom line is that they have chosen to lead, not follow…and what a joy it has been to watch their transformation and ongoing journey.

I want to personally thank the DHHL staff and those who have served on the Hawaiian Homes Commission for showing us all what great things can be achieved when you recognize we are all part of one ‘ohana.

An important part of that ‘ohana is Hawai‘i’s keiki, especially those who are most vulnerable.

Two remarkable trends have occurred in Hawai‘i’s child welfare system since 2005.

The first is a 50 percent decline in the number of children in state care, to just 1,500 children, which is the lowest number since 1993.

At the same time, Hawai‘i’s child re-abuse rate also dropped by half to just 3.1 percent, which is one of the lowest re-abuse rates in the United States.

These positive trends were the result of a fundamental shift in the state’s approach to child welfare.

The Department of Human Services previously removed children from the custody of their biological parents at a rate four times higher than the national average, with no improvement in safety outcomes.

Today, DHS, and its community partners, uses a comprehensive assessment system to carefully weigh the risk factors in a child’s family environment, and ensure that they receive much-needed social services.

Director Lillian Koller has received national recognition for these and other achievements.

In November of last year, Governing Magazine honored her as a “Public Official of the Year” for widespread improvements at the Department of Human Services, including the overhaul of the child welfare system.

This was the first time a public official from Hawai‘i has won this prestigious national award.

I know Lillian believes that this success would not have been possible without our many outstanding social service agency partners as well as her own committed staff. Mahalo to all of you.

No matter how noteworthy these and other achievements may be, recent reductions in revenue forecasts mean that they and other worthy programs will take a back seat to our more immediate need to balance the budget.

Today’s struggling economy has created a deep hole in our budget that we need to dig out of this session.

The Council on Revenues has never in its history lowered its projections by so much in such a short period of time.

Over the past eight months, the Council has reduced its general fund revenue projection by $1.4 billion.

This downward projection reflects an unprecedented decline in tourism, construction, business activity, and consumer demand brought about by national and international events beyond our control.

These events – including sub-prime lending, frozen credit markets and volatile oil and other commodity prices – will impact us for at least the next couple of years.

Climbing our way out of this hole won’t be easy.

It won’t be quick.

It won’t be without pain; but it will be done.

The pain that will be felt by individuals and organizations both in and out of government will cause some to search for a specific reason or person to blame.

When a recently retired couple watches the value of its 401K drop dramatically…or a family struggles to make the mortgage payment now that their work hours have been cut back…or a social service agency faces the need to lay off employees because the government reduces the purchase of a service contract they were counting on…it is natural to want to understand why this is happening, and to hold someone accountable.

But we must refrain from playing the blame game because we know this downturn was not caused by any of us.

And we know we had been making good decisions in recent years to create a brighter future for Hawai‘i’s people by lowering taxes, increasing science and math education, moving toward energy independence, and preserving more of our natural and cultural resources.

We also know that we are all in this together, and it is only by sticking together that we will be able to deal effectively with the immediate fiscal crisis and strengthen our economy in the long run.

We will need a mixture of courage, compassion, and collaboration to cope with the unprecedented budget gap we face.

Collaboration doesn’t mean we will see all issues the same way, it means that for the sake of Hawai‘i’s future, we must acknowledge our predicament and find an acceptable way to move ourselves forward.

In order to do this, we must start by accepting the fact that in this new economic and fiscal environment, there is simply no possible way to continue operating and spending the way we have.

Although I am extremely optimistic about Hawai‘i’s long-term prospects, I am not going to sugarcoat the immediate challenge we face.

In order to maintain the public’s confidence and trust, we must be open and honest about the nature and magnitude of what we are facing.

The reality is that we will have to make some unpopular choices that will reduce some services and cause others to be delivered in a different way.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

A number of projects will likely be delayed, curtailed, or possibly eliminated.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

We will have to ask government employees, like those who work in the private sector, to accept some reduction in wages and benefits.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

Some who currently enjoy special tax credits, exemptions and deductions will see them reduced or eliminated.

Not because we want to, but because we can’t afford business as usual.

This is a time of shared sacrifice when everyone must be willing to give up something.

This is a time when we must rely on each other, because no one is coming to rescue us.

We must also keep in mind that the economy will likely continue to soften in the near-term, perhaps causing the Council on Revenues to further reduce projections at its March meeting and then again in May after the budget is adopted.

We are not alone in facing this new reality and near-term uncertainty.

Families and businesses across the country and throughout our state have had to come to terms with this same situation.

But we should also recognize that the difficulty we face is temporary.

Our nation will regain its economic footing, and so will Hawai‘i.

How fast we recover here at home will depend to some degree on the decisions we make during this session.

Our solutions need to be decisive enough to address our immediate situation, but just as important, must prepare the way for our future.

Short-term solutions that merely defer the hard choices to those who will follow us are just as bad as no solutions at all.

We can’t meet our responsibility by kicking the can down the road.

We must make meaningful choices now that address the reality we face today while laying the foundation for a better future.

That better future is one that transitions us from an economy over-reliant on land development to one that is innovation-driven and relies on the capacity of our people.

A key area where we must bring innovation to bear is ending our over-reliance on imported foreign oil.

Oil pollutes the environment, it sucks billions of dollars out of our economy, and leaves us dependent on the goodwill of foreign countries and companies for our very survival.

We remain today the most oil-dependent state in America, but we have made great strides over the past few years.

Today windmills hum atop Kaheawa Ridge on Maui delivering clean, plentiful power and displacing the need to import 220,000 barrels of foreign oil each year.

On Lana‘i, a 10-acre solar farm now provides 30 percent of the island’s peak power needs.

A geothermal project on the Big Island that currently provides power for 30,000 homes is in discussions to increase its output by 50 percent.

And on O‘ahu, engineers are already figuring out where we will be plugging in the electric cars coming to dealer showrooms in the near future.

Last year we entered into a unique partnership with the federal Department of Energy called the Hawai‘i Clean Energy Initiative or HCEI.

It established the goal of a 70 percent clean energy economy by 2030.

HCEI experts from government, national labs, our military, utilities, universities and the private sector have recommended specific actions to achieve the 70 percent clean energy goal through indigenous renewable resources and energy conservation.

My administration and legislators will introduce several bills based on these HCEI recommendations.

These changes will significantly increase energy efficiency in our commercial buildings and residences, give consumers more control over their energy costs, transition us to alternative fuel vehicles, such as electric cars, and ban new fossil fuel power plants in Hawai‘i.

When adopted, these proposals will form the basis for Hawai‘i’s transformation to one of the world’s first economies based primarily on clean energy.

Implementing these policy changes will require a large measure of collaboration as we will need public funding, assistance from county governments, conservation by citizens, and investment by the business community.

To successfully transition to a clean energy economy, we will need the involvement of our entire community, alignment of our efforts, and a continual focus on our objectives.

I expect there will be a fair amount of spirited debate about the specific energy choices we should make, but if we recognize that we cannot go back to where we were, then I believe the choices are clear.

We can either work together toward a clean energy future or continue to operate in a business-as-usual fashion that will leave Hawai‘i vulnerable to the vagaries of world oil prices and the whims of foreign countries and companies.

As the world’s most isolated set of islands and our nation’s most oil-dependent state, a clean energy future is no longer simply a desire of environmentalists, it is an absolute necessity for our long-term economic survival.

This energy transformation is something we owe to future generations, and something they have a right to expect.

They have a right to expect energy security.

They have the right to expect stable and lower energy costs, and a cleaner environment.

They have the right to expect higher-paying, green-collar jobs that come with a thriving new energy sector.

And they have the right to expect us to stop sending up to $7 billion a year out of Hawai‘i to buy foreign oil, instead of keeping most of it here at home, to circulate in our economy.

Over the past 12 months, remarkable progress has been made toward achieving a secure energy future for our state, and we are being hailed as a national model because of our effort.

We must remain steadfast in our pursuit of energy independence and security, regardless of fluctuating oil prices.

Another area in which we must decrease our over-reliance on outside sources of supply is the food we eat.

We import 85 percent of everything we consume.

We need to take action now to increase Hawai‘i’s food self-sufficiency and strengthen and preserve agriculture for future generations as required by our State Constitution.

We must increase our efforts to protect the best agricultural lands from development.

And, we must strengthen our commitment to provide affordable water for agriculture.

Increasing our food self-sufficiency will contribute to the state’s economic recovery by keeping more of our money here at home.

If we replace just 10 percent of the food we currently import, it would create more than $300 million in economic activity, generate $6 million in taxes, and create 2,300 new jobs.

I will be asking state agencies such as schools, prisons and hospitals to take the lead by purchasing locally grown fruits, vegetables, poultry, eggs and meat.

Under new rules, Hawai‘i farmers will receive a 15 percent price preference when placing their bids for state purchases.

If we each make an effort to buy more locally produced food we will be contributing to our economic recovery, helping Hawai‘i farmers lower their unit costs, and protecting our open spaces.

Agriculture keeps Hawai‘i green, it recharges our aquifers and promotes a healthy lifestyle and good nutrition for families.

It also diversifies our economy and supports small businesses and rural communities.

Another requirement for a strong and innovative economy is an advanced communications infrastructure that will serve as the backbone for connecting us to the global economy.

This 21st century infrastructure is essential to creating the kind of high-paying jobs we are striving for in the coming years.

The communications infrastructure we have in place today barely meets our current needs.

We need to be planning for tomorrow’s needs.

We shouldn’t be limited in our thinking to believe that what we have in place today is acceptable.

We need to dream about tomorrow, and begin now to lay the groundwork for getting there.

We need a communications infrastructure that will allow us to achieve competitive advancements in the areas of: education, health care diagnosis and treatment, public safety, research and innovation, civic participation, creative media, e-government, and the foundation for overall economic development.

We have been working with the Legislature’s Broadband Task Force to craft a bill that recognizes the convergence of technologies that are used to provide voice, data and video services through wireline, wireless, cable and satellite communication.

The bill consolidates regulation and advocacy of communication services under one agency, a new Hawai‘i Communications Commission, in order to make attainable the latest communications services at the earliest possible time.

The Commission will not increase the size of government.

It will be funded from existing fees, and will focus on achieving specific goals, including: creating broadband access on a competitive basis at reduced prices…streamlining the permitting process…and providing access to businesses and residents by 2012 at prices and speeds that will make us a world leader and a place that will attract investment, while empowering our residents with enhanced communications capability.

This exciting, high-tech proposal couldn’t have moved forward without the hard work over the last two years of the Broadband Task Force, and I applaud the Legislature for the foresight shown in establishing it.

Although I have been discussing ideas that will position us well for the future, I think you would agree that the problem that bothers residents the most today is the everyday annoyance of sitting in traffic.

Sitting in a seemingly endless line of cars, burning expensive fuel, missing an appointment or your child’s soccer game, is not the way any of us want to spend our time.

The status quo has become intolerable, so we have joined with legislators in proposing a six-year, multi-island, Highways Modernization Plan to address known traffic problems with proven solutions.

This plan is intended to save lives…save time…and save money.

The program combines road building, highway and bridge safety improvements, anti-congestion traffic management, and a pavement maintenance program, in addition to safety legislation and increased public outreach and education.

The bulk of the near-term projects will be started using existing funds and anticipated federal fiscal stimulus funding.

The longer-term projects will be paid for by increases in highway-related taxes and fees that would be triggered at a future date if steady job growth indicates that our economy is growing again.

In other words, we will have a plan in place that is ready to go to construction when our economic situation improves. This innovative recommendation to tie future increases to measurable economic results in order to address a long-festering problem is the kind of creative approach being used by departments and agencies throughout government.

I have challenged every one of our departments to find new and creative ways to improve our quality of life in these tough economic and fiscal times.

The Department of Land and Natural Resources has risen to this challenge, and developed a comprehensive proposal to renew our state parks, small boat harbors and trails as well as the very way we care for these precious places – a true “Recreational Renaissance” that will benefit all residents and visitors.

The heart of the plan is $240 million in capital improvements over five years for both land- and ocean-based recreation.

The Department will fund this innovative plan by dedicating rents from some existing commercial properties to pay debt service, and developing now-vacant industrial and commercial lands that will fulfill the high demand for light industrial spaces in areas suitable for those uses.

Additional funding to support maintenance and operations will be generated from leases and concessions in parks and harbors combined with a small entry fee paid by visitors at a limited number of high-destination parks.

The plan’s final piece is the development of new land and ocean recreational opportunities through a public-private partnership to develop the long-proposed Ke‘ehi Lagoon Triangle adjacent to Lagoon Drive in Honolulu.

This centerpiece initiative will include 119 acres of light industrial space as a long-term source of revenue, coupled with new marina slips, canoe club storage and practice areas, boat ramps, storage and dry docks, beach parks and picnic areas.

I want to thank the staff at DLNR, DBEDT and Budget and Finance who developed this creative and comprehensive proposal which creates brand new, non-tax revenues and a better way of managing and caring for our recreational, natural and cultural resources.

It’s sure not business as usual at DLNR!

Working together, we can set the stage for this long-overdue “Recreational Renaissance” that will provide residents and visitors across our state with new and better recreational areas that are well-maintained, secure and enriching.

I am especially enthused about working with the Legislature on this and other proposals as a colleague rather than an adversary.

I will do more than reach across the aisle; I will walk across the aisle, and my door will always be wide open to you.

Our collaboration will demonstrate to the people of Hawai‘i that when history called on us to do so, we rose to the occasion.

I firmly believe that only by working together can we produce the kind of significant results that will enable us to exit this temporary downturn, and to position our economy for a stronger and more sustainable future.

Before concluding I want to take a moment to speak about the case pending before the United States Supreme Court involving the issue of ceded lands.

The issue involved in this case is not whether ceded lands should or should not be sold.

Rather the issue involves the fundamental question of whether the State of Hawai‘i has clear title to the land transferred to us by the federal government at the time of statehood.

The roots of this case date back to a decision made by former Governor Waihe‘e in the 1980s to sell certain ceded lands on Maui and Hawai‘i for the construction of affordable housing.

It was a decision he believed was in the best interest of all the people of Hawai‘i.

It is a decision that former Governor Cayetano defended in court because he believed it was in the best interest of all the people of Hawai‘i to do so.

And it is a decision that we are appealing to the United States Supreme Court because I believe it is in the best interest of all the people of Hawai‘i.

Acting in the best interest of all the people is the same standard I applied when supporting the Akaka Bill, fighting to protect federal programs benefiting native Hawaiians, or expediting Hawaiian Homestead leases.

And I will continue to advocate for these issues in the coming years just as passionately as I have in years past.

I call upon all who cherish what is the essence of Hawai‘i to come together with a willingness to understand and respect the nature of this case and its importance to the future of our state.

Our current fiscal crisis and the ceded lands issue arise during the same year that we commemorate our 50th anniversary as a state.

It is a time when we can reflect on just how unique we are among the 50 states.

But it is more importantly a time to remind ourselves that regardless of the short-term decisions we must make in this moment of economic difficulty, we should remain firmly anchored on the sure footing of Hawai‘i’s rich culture, diverse heritage and sometimes complicated history.

Governors of Japanese, Hawaiian, and Filipino descent have delivered State of the State addresses at this very podium.

Hawai‘i elected the first Asian American to the United States Senate.

And, less than a week ago, Hawai‘i’s heart swelled with pride as one of its own, Barack Obama, became the first African American to take the presidential oath of office when he was sworn in as our nation’s 44th president.

We have so much to be proud of in our history, and so much to look forward to in the coming years.

We are indeed the most unique among all the 50 states, and we are certainly capable of meeting this current challenge.

In my heart, I know that if we work together to make these difficult budget decisions, the people of Hawai‘i will understand that these weren’t the decisions we wanted to make but that we had to make.

The people of Hawai‘i are counting on us to lead our state through this unprecedented time – and that is exactly what we are going to do.

When the curtain comes down on our time on this stage, I want our collective legacy to win reviews as a story of pulling together for the good of all rather than being written off as a cast of characters who was each acting in their own one-man show.

If we deal decisively with the current crisis while keeping our eyes open to the opportunities that these kinds of challenging times create, then the people of Hawai‘i will conclude that we have lived up to our obligation.

Now, let’s get to work.

By Ken Schoolland

As the recession deepens in Hawaii and across the nation, academics and journalists have joined in panic chorus to warn of the dreaded economic monster: DEFLATION! What’s this? Falling prices. Is it bad? An army of lobbyists will try to persuade the Legislature and Congress that it is very bad. They will press lawmakers to prevent deflation with price controls, subsidies, and regulation.

Under the title “The Growing Threat of Deflation,” Chris Isadore explained the alarm on CNNMoney.com saying, “The biggest problem with deflation is that when businesses need to continually cut prices to spur sales, they eventually respond by cutting production. That results in growing job losses, and could, in the worst case scenario, even cause a depression.” (12-18-08)

I don’t buy it.

Increasing Wealth
Suppose retail prices are cut in half. Do we stop buying? No. We buy more because we are wealthier. Our income can buy twice as many products. And producers have an incentive to hire more people and to buy more materials to make more products. It is easy for producers to do so because their money also buys twice as much!

But if people see prices fall, moans journalist Robert Krulwich on ABC , they will stop buying because they will wait for prices to keep falling further. Really? Then what was going on when a consumer stampede killed a Wal-Mart store clerk on Long Island during the Black Friday discount sales last fall? Was that crowd at the door waiting passively for prices to fall still further?

No. People respond to lower prices. People buy more when prices fall. Economists who say otherwise are defying what they teach as “The Law of Demand” and “the wealth effect.” A good example of prices falling over the long run is in the computer industry. Prices have always been going down, but people still buy more computers and related stuff. Why? Most people buy computers when the trade for paper dollars seems worth it to them—all the time!

The Politics of Prices
Why all this hand-wringing about falling prices? To understand the alarm, one must first understand the politics of prices in Washington, D.C. People are affected differently by broad changes in prices and they have different levels of political influence. Some are winners and some are losers. If the quantity of money increases faster than increases in the quantity of products, we experience rising prices. This general rise in prices is inflation. During inflation, people with fixed incomes are losers because their income buys fewer products. They are less wealthy.

The same holds for savers and pensioners who earn a fixed income from interest. Savers and pensioners are the ultimate creditors who use banks as middlemen to loan their money on to debtors. Years later, debtors pay off their loans with “cheap” money, money that can’t buy as much because of rising prices. So savers and pensioners may get repaid in money that can’t buy as many products as before the loan. Thus creditors are big losers from inflation and debtors are big winners. Who is the biggest debtor in every country of the world? The government.

Winners & Losers
People with low incomes usually spend their dollars on daily living. Higher income people who don’t spend their dollars on daily living don’t care to hold or save a lot of paper that is losing value. Those with a lot of extra dollars trade for things that increase in value, i.e. gold and precious metals, real estate and raw materials, museum collectibles, etc. The more demand, the more those prices rise.

Who is the biggest holder of gold, real estate, and museums in every country of the world? The government. Who collects more taxes as incomes rise to higher brackets and as property values rise? The government. And who prints the dollars and spends them first? The government.

If Joe the Plumber prints a few hundred dollars, the officials arrest him for “counterfeiting.” The counterfeiter has taken products from society while simultaneously devaluing everyone’s currency. When the government prints a few hundred billion dollars, these officials are applauded for “stimulating the economy with monetary policy.” Whether accomplished by counterfeiters or monetary officials, the effect is much the same: a redistribution of wealth from the losers of inflation to the winners of inflation. In this manner, monetary policy has robbed 95 percent of the purchasing power of the dollar over the past 75 years.1

Consumer Price Index, 1800-2005

“By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.” –John Maynard Keynes

Property and Debt
My house in Waipahu nearly doubled in value over three years. It increased in value by more than I earned as income in the same period of time. The house was the same, except for wear and tear. Good for me. So where did the extra value come from? It didn’t fall out of the sky and I didn’t do anything to earn it.

No, much of this “value” came from the losses of everyone holding dollars. Thank you very much inflation. I was a big winner and I don’t deserve any tears if the price of my house should fall again later. Deflation does the opposite of inflation by reversing the winners and losers. During deflation people with fixed incomes, savings, and pensions all become wealthier as their dollars buy more products. They are winners from falling prices.

Losers from deflation are the debtors who must pay off debts with more valuable dollars. Other losers are the holders of precious metals and real estate that decline in value during deflation. The losers include many influential people, but the biggest loser in all categories is the government—it holds more debt, gold, and land than anyone else. In addition, the government faces falling tax revenues and a loss of newly printed money to spend. And politicians don’t want that.

Japan’s Lost Decade
We are told that deflation is the great horror facing our nation because debtors will find it increasingly difficult to pay off their debts. We are told this condition plagued Japan in the 1990’s and led to a “lost decade” of near zero growth. I don’t buy it.

Deflation isn’t the cause of defaults and economic collapse. Default and collapse are the consequence of extraordinary inflation and a reckless credit expansion bubble. There’s no reason to have more sympathy for debtors during deflation than the debtors have for their creditors during inflation. Both sides are responsible for the risks, not just the creditors. An inflationary bubble was created in Japan, leading to soaring real estate, stock, and credit markets. Land prices in Tokyo were so inflated that the value of the Emperor’s Palace grounds was estimated at greater than the value of all the land in California.2 That inflationary bubble had to crash, and it did. There was no stopping it—but they tried.

Inflation preceded the crisis in Japan and the winners from inflation were not going to give up their gains by permitting lower prices to restore normalcy. Instead, massive monetary infusions and price manipulations continued to interfere with, and delay, necessary economic adjustments. The economic crisis in Japan was the creature of inflation. This is the same in the U.S. today following decades of inflation and the subsequent bubble in real estate, stocks, and credit markets. Deflation is an inevitable restoration of real economic value.

“Government is the only agency which can take a useful commodity like paper, slap some ink on it, and make it totally worthless.”– Ludwig von Mises

All Bubbles Pop
Is growth impossible during deflation? Not at all. Modest deflation was normal from 1865 to 1911, one of America’s great periods of growth. The quantity of products increased faster than the quantity of money. So what? People built this into their planning.

Deflation rewarded those who saved money and invested wisely. It rewarded fixed-income workers with increasingly valuable dollars. And it penalized those who borrowed recklessly. All of this was good for growth.

Then the Federal Reserve Board was created just in time to print money and expand credit for World War I and to generate the real estate, stock market, and credit bubbles of the Roaring 20’s. RCA stock soared from a couple dollars a share to over $600 a share.3

This bubble had to collapse, and it did with the Great Depression and America’s “lost decade” of the 1930’s. It is more than coincidence that the Great Depression followed the creation of the Federal Reserve Board.

Was the Great Depression cured by more government spending? Not at all. Federal spending increased by 49 percent under President Herbert Hoover in the three years from 1929 to 1932, the greatest peacetime increase in U.S. history. President Franklin D. Roosevelt increased federal spending by another 49 percent in the five years from 1933 to 1938, and the economy was still deep in depression with nearly 18 percent unemployment.

What Spending Matters: How Much or On What?
How did Hoover and Roosevelt spend that money to prevent deflation? Both of them spent millions trying to make food scarce in order to raise prices. While consumers across the nation were suffering widespread unemployment, historian Eugene Barker recounts that FDR “made contracts with farmers to plant less land than usual in wheat, cotton, corn, rice, tobacco, and a number of other crops…farmers who entered into the contract ‘plowed under’ millions of acres of growing cotton…”

“In order to reduce the supply of hogs and cattle, so that the price of bacon, hams, and beef might go up,” says Barker, “the government bought and destroyed several million pigs and beeves.” 4

Roosevelt’s advisors said this was good for the economy. Well, all this spending was good for farmers, bureaucrats, and generous politicians. But it was not good for the economy. It was disastrous for most folk because it meant there would be less food and clothing amidst higher prices and higher direct and indirect taxes. More important than how much money is spent locally or nationally, is how wisely money is spent. And massive government spending typically redirects wealth from productive investment to unproductive malinvestment.

Virtue and Vice
Inflation now seems inevitable to anyone who grew up after World War II. Few people alive today can remember a time when prices were actually stable or going down. The result is that inflationary monetary policy always punishes savers and rewards debtors with perverse incentives.

Thus, Americans have become addicted to spending and debt. Americans don’t save enough for their own retirement, for their own education, for their own health care, for their own unemployment or other emergencies. Instead, Americans have become dependent on politicians and the government to provide for their retirement, education, health care, unemployment and other emergencies.

And where does government get the money to do all of this? They print dollars and they borrow dollars from those who do save a lot, i.e. the Asians of rapidly emerging markets abroad. Is it time for the government to reverse these incentives—to reward savers and punish debtors with deflation? No.

It is time for the government to get out of the business of manipulating the value of “legal tender” as a way of increasing its power and manipulating people. Officials with fine hats are neither smart enough nor virtuous enough to rule us in this manner. We have been the toys, the broken and abused toys, of politicians and elitist monetary officials long enough.

The government monopoly on currency through legal tender laws should end. Americans should be free to choose alternative currencies to work for and to save.5 Governments are not good at running monopolies. When there is competitive choice, people will look for quality alternatives, and the government will finally have a motive to stop ruining the dollar by inflation.

Footnotes:
1. Rockwell, Lewellyn H., “The Blessings of Deflation,” Ludwig von Mises Institute, 5-30-03.
2. Emmott, Bill, The Sun Also Sets, Page 118.
3. de Aenlle, Conrad, “Is Frenzy for Internet Stocks a Bubble Waiting to Burst?“, International Herald Tribune, 9-25-99.
4. Barker, Eugene, The Building of Our Nation, Row, Peterson & Co., Evanston, Illinois, 1948, p. 776.
5. Paul, Ron, “Ron Paul on Legal Tender Laws,” RonPaul.com, Sept. 28, 2008.

… and deferring the transit tax for a year or more to provide relief to Hawaii tax payers. Everything is on the table for debate and discussion.

~ Colleen Hanabusa, from Senate President speech (01/21/09)

Quotable Slom

by admin | January 21, 2009 | In Hawaii politics, Quotable No Comments

This session we pledge to the people of Hawaii who look to all of us for leadership, to listen even more, work even harder, cooperate for the good of all our people, and to passionately continue to stand up against bad laws, poor economics and loss of freedom and choice.

~ Sam Slom, Senate Minority Speech (01/21/09)

Hawaii’s been good to me… the great thing about democracy in Hawaii is that now the maka’ainana (commoner) have a shot.  We all have a voice in the process.

~ Al Harrington

Email Extractor samsung cell phone accessories